{original}
Set up the review
', "Confirm what we should look for
", f'Before any agreement review begins, check the {issue_count} ' f"questions, the {len(substantive)} agreements received, and the proposed review " "scope. You can change any of them now.
", f'', alert, 'Decision 1 of 3
', 'Are these the right review questions?
', f'Each selected agreement will be checked against every one of ' f"the {issue_count} questions below.
',
'
",
"What counts as a matchAgreement language that directly addresses the approved question. Every match must include a verbatim quote and section reference. Missing schedules or outside facts become “Needs a decision”—never “Not found.” No risk, severity, materiality, or recommendation ranking will be applied.
',
'',
render_question_list(items),
"See the exact match definitions and evidence rules
", "“Not found” means only that the supplied agreement text did not contain language meeting the definition. It does not cover missing schedules, amendments, side letters, or outside facts.
", render_rule_table(items), "Decision 2 of 3
', 'Does this look like the collection you expected?
', 'You are confirming what is available for review—not certifying that the data room or transaction record is legally complete.
',
f'
{len(substantive)}agreements to review
',
f'{len(control)}instruction input
',
f'{esc(date_span)}stated agreement dates
',
f'{duplicates + unreadable_total}duplicate or unreadable files
',
"Review the supplied agreements and dates
", 'Review copies are hash-bound to the manifest and rechecked before this page is issued.
', render_documents(substantive, source_prefix, review_validation), "Review instructions and collection limits
", render_documents(control, source_prefix, review_validation), render_gaps(entries), "This is a contract collection, so custodian statistics are not applicable. The practical question is whether these are the agreements and referenced materials you expected us to have.
", "How the agreements will be reviewed together
", "Does this grouping match how you understand the agreements and their related documents?
", render_groups(families, documents), "Decision 3 of 3
', f'{esc(scope_heading)}
', f'{esc(scope_help)}
',
render_scope_rows(sample),
'
Why this scope',
f"{esc(sample.get('selection_basis', 'The selected agreements cover the proposed review scope.'))}
",
"{esc(approval_heading)}
', 'Approval is narrow. The review stops again before any final use of the results.
', '',
f'
",
f'What approving this does{esc(authorizes)}
',
'What it does not doIt does not authorize risk or materiality rankings, legal conclusions, recommendations, privilege rulings, sending, producing, publishing, or final transaction decisions.
',
"',
f'
',
'',
f'',
'Nothing on this page records approval or starts review.
',
'',
"Technical receipts and reproducibility details
', "Practical consequence: source identity and the review instructions remain bound. If a supplied file, agreement grouping, review question, or scope changes, this approval becomes stale and must be renewed.
", f"Internal control: Gate 1 · framework version {esc(readback.get('framework_version', 'not recorded'))} · framework status {'approved' if readback.get('approved') else 'not approved'} · deterministic local rendering · no findings exist.
Review-copy receipt: {esc(review_validation.sidecar.get('digest'))} · status {esc(review_validation.sidecar.get('status'))}.
- ",
]
for document in sorted(documents.values(), key=lambda row: row["id"]):
parts.append(
f"
{esc(document['id'])}· " f"{esc(document.get('path', ''))} "
)
parts.extend(
[
"