# [Subject Name] — Disclosure Delta

**Headline:** [Factual one-liner. Examples: "All disclosed items confirmed by Intelligo." / "Subject disclosed [N] items; Intelligo found [N+M], so [M] items were not disclosed." / "All Intelligo findings matched what was disclosed." No verdict words.]

**Subject:** [Name], [Role] · [Entity]
**Report:** Intelligo L[X] · [Date]

---

## What [subject term] disclosed

| Item | Detail |
|------|--------|
| [e.g. Prior employment] | [e.g. Listed Company A 2018–2022] |
| [e.g. Legal history] | [e.g. None disclosed] |

## What Intelligo found

| Item | Detail | Source |
|------|--------|--------|
| [e.g. Prior employment] | [e.g. Company A 2018–2022, plus Company B 2015–2017] | [source] |
| [e.g. Legal history] | [e.g. 2019 civil suit, settled, $X amount] | [source] |

---

## Gaps (found, not disclosed)

🔴 **[Item 1]** — [Severity level + the underlying finding text. State what was found and when. Do not say "material" or "concerning" — those are IC verdicts. The IC reads the gap and the severity level, and decides for itself.]
🟡 **[Item 2]** — [Severity + finding text.]

## Matches (found, also disclosed)

✅ [Item] — [Found in Intelligo at [severity], also disclosed by subject.]

---

**Coverage:** [Categories checked at this report level]
**Note:** Intelligo does not assess intent. The IC decides what each gap means.

