{"id":4910,"external_id":"plugins_6ab0c5fbd69081919fa85386d207bb40","name":"crypto-research-skills","display_name":"Cryptography Research Skills","developer":"Ziyang Jin","category":"Education & Research","listing_language":"en","listing_language_details":{"method":"cld-0.13.0/listing-v1","reliable":true,"detected_at":"2026-10-01T13:22:05Z","input_sha256":"df0e75930099b94aa3c9dcf162bfd108f2db8681bb103ac0438d151b01182e77","source_fields":["release.description","release.interface.short_description","release.interface.long_description"]},"version":"0.1.0","skill_count":12,"first_seen_at":"2026-09-30T22:02:35.000Z","last_seen_at":"2026-10-03T12:00:00.636Z","last_changed_at":"2026-09-30T22:02:35.000Z","install_count":null,"search_matches":[],"research_summary":null,"research_reviewed_at":null,"metadata":{"canonical_app_id":null,"connector_id":null,"created_at":"2026-09-21T05:58:17.600236Z","discoverability":"UNLISTED","id":"plugins_6ab0c5fbd69081919fa85386d207bb40","is_template":false,"name":"crypto-research-skills","release":{"app_ids":[],"app_manifest":null,"app_templates":[],"description":"Twelve focused workflows for cryptography research, proof review, manuscript writing, protocol implementation, benchmarking, and reproducible artifacts.","display_name":"Cryptography Research Skills","id":"pluginrel_799baaa3af1c81919502eb7a5f28c5cb","interface":{"brand_color":"#173B52","capabilities":["Research framing and literature evidence","Cryptographic proof review","Technical writing and manuscript checks","Protocol implementation and benchmark accounting","Reproducible research artifacts"],"category":"Education & Research","composer_icon_dark_url":null,"composer_icon_url":"https://files.openai.com/content?id=file_00000000e22081fb82da1e89b3816b12","default_prompt":"Audit this cryptographic proof under its stated model. Report gaps without editing the source.","default_prompts":["Audit this cryptographic proof under its stated model. Report gaps without editing the source.","Improve this cryptography paragraph with the smallest edit that preserves its claim and notation.","Check whether these benchmark measurements support the comparison and its stated cost boundaries."],"developer_name":"Ziyang Jin","logo_url":"https://files.openai.com/content?id=file_00000000bc1081fb8169c99bef10a581","logo_url_dark":null,"long_description":"Twelve focused skills for researchers working on cryptographic constructions and papers, especially secure multiparty computation and zero-knowledge proofs.\n\nFormulate research questions, trace literature claims to primary sources, draft and minimally edit technical prose, and examine security arguments under their stated definitions and assumptions. For implementation work, use separate workflows for protocol correspondence, benchmark accounting, evaluation writing, and reproducible artifacts.\n\nThe skills emphasize precise models, evidence provenance, conservative claims, and keeping the requested scope small. Proof audits distinguish confirmed errors, proof gaps, unstated assumptions, and unverified dependencies. They are read-only unless edits or proof completion are requested.\n\nThis package provides workflow instructions and references. It does not certify security, replace expert review, or supply a proof assistant. The host agent's available tools determine which searches, file edits, builds, and experiments can actually run.","plugin_category_id":"education & research","privacy_policy_url":null,"screenshot_urls":[],"short_description":"Research workflows for crypto","terms_of_service_url":null,"website_url":"https://github.com/ziyang-theory/cryptography-research-skills"},"keywords":["cryptography","research","MPC","zero-knowledge","proofs","scientific-writing"],"onboarding_skill_name":null,"requires_local_executor":false,"skills":[{"description":"Draft or review AI-use disclosures in cryptography papers from the actual account of assistance and human checking. Distinguish research, writing, code, experiments, and formalization; do not certify proofs or infer AI use.","interface":{"brand_color":null,"default_prompt":"Use $crypto-ai-acknowledgements to draft or review an AI-use acknowledgement for my cryptography paper from the supplied account of assistance and human checking.","display_name":"Cryptography AI Acknowledgements","icon_large_url":null,"icon_small_url":null,"iconography":"pen","short_description":"Draft precise AI-use disclosures for cryptography papers"},"name":"crypto-ai-acknowledgements","plugin_release_skill_id":"pluginrsk_6ab0c5fdaa5081918b2d8559d948a4c2"},{"description":"Design, run, or audit cryptographic experiments and evidence-to-table calculations with explicit timing, communication, memory, and statistical accounting. Use for measurements and their interpretation, not protocol implementation or evaluation prose alone.","interface":{"brand_color":null,"default_prompt":"Use $crypto-benchmarking to define and run a reproducible cryptographic benchmark with explicit timing and communication accounting.","display_name":"Cryptography Benchmarking","icon_large_url":null,"icon_small_url":null,"iconography":"chart","short_description":"Measure cryptographic costs with traceable evidence"},"name":"crypto-benchmarking","plugin_release_skill_id":"pluginrsk_6ab0c5fed33081919954e3ac2224a93f"},{"description":"Define and compare cryptographic correlation counts, PCG expansion ratios, and throughput units by algebraic relation, domain, grouping, and denominator. Use when lanes, entries, blocks, calls, or correlation rates are ambiguous; not for protocol implementation or benchmark execution alone.","interface":{"brand_color":null,"default_prompt":"Use $crypto-correlation-accounting to define and normalize these correlation counts or throughput claims.","display_name":"Crypto Correlation Accounting","icon_large_url":null,"icon_small_url":null,"iconography":"chart","short_description":"Normalize cryptographic correlation units"},"name":"crypto-correlation-accounting","plugin_release_skill_id":"pluginrsk_6ab0c5fd8fc48191943cfd35a38048f8"},{"description":"Draft, revise, or review cryptography implementation and evaluation sections from code and experimental evidence. Use for supported performance claims, fair comparisons, and identifying missing evidence; not benchmark execution or raw analysis alone.","interface":{"brand_color":null,"default_prompt":"Use $crypto-implementation-evaluation-writing to turn MPC or zero-knowledge implementation evidence into a precise evaluation section.","display_name":"Crypto Implementation Evaluation","icon_large_url":null,"icon_small_url":null,"iconography":"pen","short_description":"Write reproducible cryptography evaluations"},"name":"crypto-implementation-evaluation-writing","plugin_release_skill_id":"pluginrsk_6ab0c600371481918e4823c3eeba095a"},{"description":"Find and verify primary-source cryptography claims, compare paper versions, and synthesize literature or research methods with exact source locators. Use for citation checks and surveys; not for proof-validity audits or prose revision alone.","interface":{"brand_color":null,"default_prompt":"Use $crypto-literature-evidence to verify and synthesize the primary-source evidence for this cryptography question.","display_name":"Crypto Literature Evidence","icon_large_url":null,"icon_small_url":null,"iconography":"search","short_description":"Build traceable evidence from crypto papers"},"name":"crypto-literature-evidence","plugin_release_skill_id":"pluginrsk_6ab0c5fe87388191b12196eb19f9f2c8"},{"description":"Check cryptography manuscript sources, LaTeX builds, PDF locations, references, layout, and requested paper/code consistency. Use for source or rendered-document QA; not for prose-only drafting, proof validity, or benchmark collection.","interface":{"brand_color":null,"default_prompt":"Use $crypto-manuscript-qa to check the authoritative manuscript sources, references, and rendered PDF within the requested scope.","display_name":"Cryptography Manuscript QA","icon_large_url":null,"icon_small_url":null,"iconography":"pdf","short_description":"Validate cryptographic sources and rendered papers"},"name":"crypto-manuscript-qa","plugin_release_skill_id":"pluginrsk_6ab0c5fd7810819180f9068359007447"},{"description":"Draft or review cryptography prior-work comparisons and comparison tables by aligning models, construction variants, costs, and evidence. Use for positioning results, not literature discovery alone or benchmark execution.","interface":{"brand_color":null,"default_prompt":"Use $crypto-prior-work-comparison to draft a fair comparison with prior cryptographic results.","display_name":"Crypto Prior-Work Comparison","icon_large_url":null,"icon_small_url":null,"iconography":"chart","short_description":"Write fair cryptography prior-work comparisons"},"name":"crypto-prior-work-comparison","plugin_release_skill_id":"pluginrsk_6ab0c5fd800481919b83ccb13df22306"},{"description":"Audit or complete cryptographic proofs, reductions, simulators, and security theorems. Use for proof-validity questions; read-only unless completion or source edits are requested. Not for prose-only, code-conformance, or PDF reviews.","interface":{"brand_color":null,"default_prompt":"Use $crypto-proof-auditor to audit this cryptographic proof for concrete gaps and unsupported claims.","display_name":"Crypto Proof Auditor","icon_large_url":null,"icon_small_url":null,"iconography":"code","short_description":"Defect-first audits of cryptographic proofs"},"name":"crypto-proof-auditor","plugin_release_skill_id":"pluginrsk_6ab0c5ff8cb08191bc00d31a43cc3fa2"},{"description":"Implement, optimize, reproduce, or review cryptographic protocol code against its specification. Use for circuit, transcript, state, sampler, and adapter fidelity and security obligations affected by code changes; not a full proof-validity audit.","interface":{"brand_color":null,"default_prompt":"Use $crypto-protocol-implementation to implement, optimize, or review a cryptographic protocol against its specification and identify the security contracts and proof obligations affected by any changes.","display_name":"Cryptographic Protocol Implementation","icon_large_url":null,"icon_small_url":null,"iconography":"code","short_description":"Implement protocols with paper-to-code fidelity"},"name":"crypto-protocol-implementation","plugin_release_skill_id":"pluginrsk_6ab0c5ffcc688191b8969a0bd2fd0c96"},{"description":"Prepare, document, anonymize, validate, or package cryptography research artifacts. Use for reviewer workflows, claim-to-command maps, and validation from a fresh extraction; not protocol proofs or benchmark execution alone.","interface":{"brand_color":null,"default_prompt":"Use $crypto-research-artifacts to prepare and validate a scoped reviewer artifact for a cryptography paper.","display_name":"Cryptography Research Artifacts","icon_large_url":null,"icon_small_url":null,"iconography":"hierarchy","short_description":"Prepare reproducible cryptography research packages"},"name":"crypto-research-artifacts","plugin_release_skill_id":"pluginrsk_6ab0c60052888191ad65e4d747f88b08"},{"description":"Turn an exploratory cryptography idea into a candidate lemma, construction approach, counterexample, or precise obstruction. Use for choosing the next mathematical step, not local prose edits or auditing an existing proof.","interface":{"brand_color":null,"default_prompt":"Use $crypto-research-framing to identify the next lemma or obstruction for this cryptography research idea.","display_name":"Cryptography Research Framing","icon_large_url":null,"icon_small_url":null,"iconography":"code","short_description":"Turn research ideas into lemmas and counterexamples"},"name":"crypto-research-framing","plugin_release_skill_id":"pluginrsk_6ab0c5fec82881919e6eb8514aabce3b"},{"description":"Draft or minimally edit cryptography manuscripts, including definitions, theorem statements, security arguments, abstracts, and technical overviews. Preserve the construction and guarantee; use crypto-proof-auditor for substantive proof-validity review.","interface":{"brand_color":null,"default_prompt":null,"display_name":"cryptography-writing","icon_large_url":null,"icon_small_url":null,"iconography":"pen","short_description":"Draft or minimally edit cryptography manuscripts, including definitions, theorem statements, security arguments, abstracts, and technical overviews. Preserve the construction and guarantee; use crypto-proof-auditor for substantive proof-validity review."},"name":"cryptography-writing","plugin_release_skill_id":"pluginrsk_6ab0c5fe6a4c8191ab2db50d7d7ad294"}],"version":"0.1.0"},"scope":"GLOBAL","status":"ENABLED"},"research":null,"package_metadata":{"name":"crypto-research-skills","author":{"url":"https://github.com/ziyang-theory","name":"Ziyang Jin"},"license":"MIT","sources":[{"path":"plugin.json","sha256":"bc4416051fe31d94f1322943f42cebddc94c12c1c99095c1b69a4345fb9a6d91"},{"path":".codex-plugin/plugin.json","sha256":"1f70910cf7ca3f5911c6623dabe16b86066425257a2818e475033ae29ae6a2da"}],"version":"0.1.0","homepage":"https://github.com/ziyang-theory/cryptography-research-skills","keywords":["cryptography","research","MPC","zero-knowledge","proofs","scientific-writing"],"repository":"https://github.com/ziyang-theory/cryptography-research-skills","artifact_id":17442,"observed_at":"2026-10-03T06:36:45Z","support_url":"https://github.com/ziyang-theory/cryptography-research-skills#introduction","capabilities":["Research framing and literature evidence","Cryptographic proof review","Technical writing and manuscript checks","Protocol implementation and benchmark accounting","Reproducible research artifacts"],"field_sources":{"name":0,"author":0,"license":0,"version":0,"homepage":0,"keywords":0,"repository":0,"support_url":0,"capabilities":0},"extraction_version":1,"conflicts_or_errors":[]}}