{"id":2120,"external_id":"plugin_asdk_app_6a6cf8d9a6888191aca749044c9f2807","name":"app-6a6cf8d9a6888191aca749044c9f2807","display_name":"OpenRegs: Regulatory Research","developer":"OpenLaws Public Benefit Corporation","category":"Education & Research","listing_language":"en","listing_language_details":{"method":"cld-0.13.0/listing-v1","reliable":true,"detected_at":"2026-10-01T13:21:57Z","input_sha256":"0060efdbdbc20959656ac2bf6682b3a2e1cb50b8c0c0c00baff9da7f7404ab38","source_fields":["release.description","release.interface.short_description","release.interface.long_description"]},"version":"1.0.0","skill_count":2,"first_seen_at":"2026-09-30T22:02:35.000Z","last_seen_at":"2026-10-02T00:00:02.003Z","last_changed_at":"2026-09-30T22:02:35.000Z","install_count":null,"research_summary":null,"research_reviewed_at":null,"metadata":{"id":"plugin_asdk_app_6a6cf8d9a6888191aca749044c9f2807","name":"app-6a6cf8d9a6888191aca749044c9f2807","scope":"GLOBAL","status":"ENABLED","release":{"id":"pluginrel_f75afe6272508191881390f9207cbd88","skills":[{"name":"citation-validator","interface":{"brand_color":null,"iconography":"search","display_name":"citation-validator","default_prompt":null,"icon_large_url":null,"icon_small_url":null,"short_description":"Validate or read a SINGLE U.S. statutory or regulatory citation the user names — confirm it resolves to real, in-force law and return the official text with a clickable provenance link. This is the free OpenRegs capability: one named citation in, verified text out. The trigger is a specific citation in hand: use this skill, in preference to the research assistant, whenever the user names one to check or read (e.g. \"is Tex. Lab. Code § 411.103 real?\", \"is 29 U.S.C. § 201 still good law?\", \"pull Cal. Lab. Code § 512\"). It does NOT search by topic, compare jurisdictions, or do open research — when the user names no specific citation and needs law found, compared, or explored, that is the research assistant's job, and this skill points there."},"description":"Validate or read a SINGLE U.S. statutory or regulatory citation the user names — confirm it resolves to real, in-force law and return the official text with a clickable provenance link. This is the free OpenRegs capability: one named citation in, verified text out. The trigger is a specific citation in hand: use this skill, in preference to the research assistant, whenever the user names one to check or read (e.g. \"is Tex. Lab. Code § 411.103 real?\", \"is 29 U.S.C. § 201 still good law?\", \"pull Cal. Lab. Code § 512\"). It does NOT search by topic, compare jurisdictions, or do open research — when the user names no specific citation and needs law found, compared, or explored, that is the research assistant's job, and this skill points there.","plugin_release_skill_id":"pluginrsk_6a70b736aa44819187f8b4382c23281d"},{"name":"surveyor","interface":{"brand_color":null,"iconography":"search","display_name":"surveyor","default_prompt":null,"icon_large_url":null,"icon_small_url":null,"short_description":"Research U.S. codified law — statutes, regulations, and constitutional provisions, federal or any jurisdiction OpenLaws covers — when the user needs law FOUND, COMPARED, or EXPLORED rather than a citation they already hold read back. Covers topic questions (\"what does [state] law say about...\"), multi-jurisdiction surveys, and open-ended research where the user does NOT name a specific citation. ALSO take questions about court decisions, controlling cases, holdings, or precedent: case law is outside the corpus, so claim them and decline with discipline — name the boundary, cite the governing statute, point to case-law sources — rather than leave them to an unverified answer. Same for pending rule changes or past-date rules. If the user hands you one named citation to confirm or read back, that is citation-validator's job. Ground every claim in the OpenRegs MCP tools FIRST (never training data; web only via the official-source exception), produce a research log, and refuse when a claim can't be grounded."},"description":"Research U.S. codified law — statutes, regulations, and constitutional provisions, federal or any jurisdiction OpenLaws covers — when the user needs law FOUND, COMPARED, or EXPLORED rather than a citation they already hold read back. Covers topic questions (\"what does [state] law say about...\"), multi-jurisdiction surveys, and open-ended research where the user does NOT name a specific citation. ALSO take questions about court decisions, controlling cases, holdings, or precedent: case law is outside the corpus, so claim them and decline with discipline — name the boundary, cite the governing statute, point to case-law sources — rather than leave them to an unverified answer. Same for pending rule changes or past-date rules. If the user hands you one named citation to confirm or read back, that is citation-validator's job. Ground every claim in the OpenRegs MCP tools FIRST (never training data; web only via the official-source exception), produce a research log, and refuse when a claim can't be grounded.","plugin_release_skill_id":"pluginrsk_6a70b75158f88191a396a38f557f4808"}],"app_ids":["asdk_app_6a6cf8d9a6888191aca749044c9f2807"],"version":"1.0.0","keywords":[],"interface":{"category":"Education & Research","logo_url":"https://files.openai.com/content?id=file_00000000282c81f795eac8aa25e06946","brand_color":null,"website_url":"https://openlaws.us","capabilities":[],"logo_url_dark":"https://files.openai.com/content?id=file_000000002bd881f78eb5641bfc2b7be4","default_prompt":"Is 42 U.S.C. § 1983 a real citation? Show me the text.","developer_name":"OpenLaws Public Benefit Corporation","default_prompts":["Is 42 U.S.C. § 1983 a real citation? Show me the text.","Compare meal-break requirements across California, New York, and Texas.","What does California law say about independent contractor classification?"],"screenshot_urls":[],"long_description":"OpenRegs brings current U.S. statutes and regulations into ChatGPT for compliance teams. Coverage spans 53 jurisdictions: all 50 states, D.C., Puerto Rico, and federal. Every answer returns the actual text of the law, along with a research log and public citation links that anyone can open, so a colleague or an auditor can check the work rather than take a summary on faith. Run a 50-state survey in one request instead of maintaining a spreadsheet by hand. Built by OpenLaws PBC, the public benefit corporation behind the OpenLaws API. OpenLaws is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice.\n\nUse cases:\n- Confirm a citation is real and still in force, then read its current text.\n- Compare how a rule differs across multiple states in one request.\n- Research a regulatory topic across U.S. statutes and regulations, with a research log and citations you can verify.","composer_icon_url":"https://files.openai.com/content?id=file_00000000ac0c81f7b7692ec5281b7c7b","short_description":"Up-to-date laws, not the web","plugin_category_id":"education & research","privacy_policy_url":"https://openlaws.us/privacy","terms_of_service_url":"https://openlaws.us/terms","composer_icon_dark_url":"https://files.openai.com/content?id=file_000000004d2c81f79a097d259eb56eab"},"description":"OpenRegs brings current U.S. statutes and regulations into ChatGPT for compliance teams. Coverage spans 53 jurisdictions: all 50 states, D.C., Puerto Rico, and federal. Every answer returns the actual text of the law, along with a research log and public citation links that anyone can open, so a colleague or an auditor can check the work rather than take a summary on faith. Run a 50-state survey in one request instead of maintaining a spreadsheet by hand. Built by OpenLaws PBC, the public benefit corporation behind the OpenLaws API. OpenLaws is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice.\n\nUse cases:\n- Confirm a citation is real and still in force, then read its current text.\n- Compare how a rule differs across multiple states in one request.\n- Research a regulatory topic across U.S. statutes and regulations, with a research log and citations you can verify.","app_manifest":{"apps":{"app-6a6cf8d9a6888191aca749044c9f2807":{"id":"asdk_app_6a6cf8d9a6888191aca749044c9f2807","required":true}}},"display_name":"OpenRegs: Regulatory Research","app_templates":[],"onboarding_skill_name":null,"requires_local_executor":false},"created_at":"2026-07-31T19:34:49.776133Z","is_template":false,"connector_id":"asdk_app_6a6cf8d9a6888191aca749044c9f2807","discoverability":"LISTED","canonical_app_id":"asdk_app_6a6cf8d9a6888191aca749044c9f2807"},"research":null,"package_metadata":{"name":"app-6a6cf8d9a6888191aca749044c9f2807","author":{"name":"OpenLaws Public Benefit Corporation"},"sources":[{"path":".codex-plugin/plugin.json","sha256":"ddcff3b46704964f2c0290bf17930062e936b2d8ae7cec6c77a23b71d4030f62"}],"version":"1.0.0","artifact_id":8818,"observed_at":"2026-10-02T00:16:03Z","support_url":"https://support.openlaws.us/","field_sources":{"name":0,"author":0,"version":0,"support_url":0},"extraction_version":1,"conflicts_or_errors":[]}}