{"id":10256,"plugin_id":"plugin_asdk_app_6a8647b15d3c81919aad77ef5a08855a","kind":"skill","collection_source":null,"comparison_source":null,"observed_at":"2026-09-30T22:56:46.132Z","digest":"b321c164a1f5257c73d75cd5ba4a2ff889f28edc7f225196750f32b08e17390a","against":null,"payload":{"name":"draft-eduinsights-brief","description":"Turn EduInsights college, field, career, workforce, accreditation, or AI-use research into a concise decision brief for a provost, dean, workforce leader, policymaker, or advisor. Use when the person asks for a briefing, memo, recommendation, comparison summary, or decision-ready synthesis rather than a raw data answer.","included_files":[{"relative_path":"agents/openai.yaml","size_in_bytes":564},{"relative_path":"references/brief-template.md","size_in_bytes":1594}],"skill_md_contents":"---\nname: draft-eduinsights-brief\ndescription: Turn EduInsights college, field, career, workforce, accreditation, or AI-use research into a concise decision brief for a provost, dean, workforce leader, policymaker, or advisor. Use when the person asks for a briefing, memo, recommendation, comparison summary, or decision-ready synthesis rather than a raw data answer.\n---\n\n# Draft an EduInsights brief\n\nBuild the brief from verified evidence. If the provided research lacks a material measure, source, period, or comparison, use the EduInsights tools to fill that gap before drafting.\n\n## Set the decision\n\nIdentify:\n\n- who will use the brief;\n- the decision they need to make;\n- the options or entities under consideration;\n- the period and geography;\n- the evidence that would change the decision.\n\nAsk a question only when the missing choice would materially change the recommendation.\n\n## Research proportionately\n\nUse `edu_resolve_entity` for names. Prefer `edu_get_institution`, `edu_get_program`, `edu_get_occupation`, `edu_compare`, and `edu_aggregate`. Use `edu_get_sources` to verify releases. Use SQL only for a necessary question the focused tools cannot answer.\n\nDo not fill gaps with assumptions. Mark an important unanswered part as an evidence gap and explain what source would resolve it.\n\n## Draft the brief\n\nRead [brief-template.md](references/brief-template.md). Use only the sections that help the decision.\n\nLead with the decision and the strongest supporting finding. Keep findings separate from judgment. Tie every figure to a year and source. Translate internal data terms into ordinary language.\n\nDo not show codes, relation names, or SQL unless the audience needs a reproducible appendix.\n\n## Check the result\n\nBefore finishing:\n\n1. confirm the recommendation follows from the cited evidence;\n2. confirm comparisons use aligned periods and measures;\n3. state the strongest alternative explanation or limit;\n4. distinguish reported degrees from current catalog programs;\n5. distinguish related careers from graduate destinations;\n6. distinguish observed AI use from employment forecasts;\n7. make the next action specific and proportionate to the evidence.\n"},"changes":[],"summary":"First saved snapshot. No earlier version is available for comparison.","summary_kind":"deterministic","summary_metadata":{}}