{"id":16115,"plugin_id":"plugin_asdk_app_6a932278a9f481919512c774ad64c358","kind":"skill","collection_source":null,"comparison_source":null,"observed_at":"2026-09-30T23:12:50.225Z","digest":"af01e0982134afdc8e95549b95bf957a38d14fb25a6207e5c432f5bef9e5b540","against":null,"payload":{"description":"Compare validated Inner Lens system reports, bound to one release bundle, when a user requests a bounded, traceable cross-method evidence view.","included_files":[{"relative_path":"references/synthesis-contract.md","size_in_bytes":3491}],"name":"synthesize-metaphysics","skill_md_contents":"---\nname: synthesize-metaphysics\ndescription: Compare validated Inner Lens system reports, bound to one release bundle, when a user requests a bounded, traceable cross-method evidence view.\n---\n\n# Synthesize validated Inner Lens reports\n\nRequire separate canonical calculation and validation for each selected system before synthesis: use this Skill only with two or three per-system `validatedReport` payloads returned by `validate_interpretation_report` in the same current conversation. Each source must be `valid: true`, have `nextAction: render-validated`, represent a distinct system among Liuyao, Bazi, and Ziwei, and be validated under the exact same current release bundle. If fewer than two qualifying sources remain, stop with an explicit limitation.\n\n1. Read [the complete synthesis contract](references/synthesis-contract.md).\n2. Never treat a facts-only `fallback`, a `repair-once` result, or an unvalidated draft as a validated source. Never cite raw model prose, an invalid report, or a report validated under a different release bundle. Never use remembered traditional meaning or a source from another conversation.\n3. Call the registered `get_cross_method_evidence` tool with the exact validated reports and the release bundle each was validated under. Present only its returned bounded `overlap`, `divergence`, and `limitation` sections, already linked to source claim IDs, evidence, and limitations. Preserve the source system, school, reading contract, target period, claim IDs, evidence references, counter-evidence, and limitations without reinterpretation.\n4. Do not call `prepare_interpretation` or `validate_interpretation_report` for synthesis, and do not call calculation, chart, or export tools. The report-v2 contract is system-owned; this Skill does not produce its own validated cross-method report v2.\n5. No compatibility verdict, score, prediction, recommendation, or remembered traditional meaning. Do not vote, rank, merge conflicting claims, invent a bridge, or claim overlap across systems as independent confirmation.\n\nPlan 5 owns validated-only cross-method synthesis: a bounded, release-bundle-bound evidence view over already validated system reports, never a new divination conclusion.\n"},"changes":[],"summary":"First saved snapshot. No earlier version is available for comparison.","summary_kind":"deterministic","summary_metadata":{}}