{"id":17269,"plugin_id":"plugins_6a75dc82c0fc81919985d8f2dc208355","kind":"skill","collection_source":null,"comparison_source":null,"observed_at":"2026-09-30T23:14:04.887Z","digest":"8130886b75335b7ee767e37bcf59bbdb587e5843a11b199561dea59d14e1057f","against":null,"payload":{"description":"Organise physical, documentary, digital, demonstrative, witness, and expert evidence against disputed facts and legal elements. Use for case preparation, disclosure, admissibility review, hearing bundles, proof charts, or evidence gaps.","included_files":[{"relative_path":"agents/openai.yaml","size_in_bytes":282}],"name":"evidence-organizer","skill_md_contents":"---\nname: evidence-organizer\ndescription: >-\n  Organise physical, documentary, digital, demonstrative, witness, and expert\n  evidence against disputed facts and legal elements. Use for case preparation,\n  disclosure, admissibility review, hearing bundles, proof charts, or evidence gaps.\n---\n\n# Evidence Organizer\n\nBuild an issue-to-proof system in which every item retains provenance, custody,\nauthenticity, admissibility, privilege, and source locators.\n\n## Intake\n\nObtain the jurisdiction and forum, pleadings and issues, elements and burdens,\ndisclosure orders, evidence inventory, custody and metadata, witness and expert\nmaterials, objections, confidentiality restrictions, bundle rules, and trial plan.\n\n## Organisation method\n\n1. Preserve originals and assign stable IDs to each item, version, attachment,\n   extract, demonstrative, and derivative.\n2. Record source, custodian, collection method, date, time zone, integrity checks,\n   confidentiality, privilege, production number, and page or media locator.\n3. Create a fact-and-element matrix showing burden, standard, supporting evidence,\n   contrary evidence, agreed facts, admissions, and missing proof.\n4. Describe what each item directly proves, what inference is requested, and\n   alternative explanations. Do not label relevance as truth.\n5. Identify the sponsoring witness or other foundation for authenticity,\n   completeness, custody, personal knowledge, business records, expert opinion,\n   digital evidence, translations, summaries, and demonstratives.\n6. Test forum-specific objections and exceptions: relevance, prejudice,\n   hearsay, opinion, character, privilege, without-prejudice protection,\n   best-evidence or original-document rules, notice, and late disclosure.\n7. Link contradictions and corroboration across pleadings, testimony, documents,\n   metadata, physical items, and expert material.\n8. Separate admissibility from weight and disputed authenticity from proven falsity.\n9. Build hearing and witness views without changing the master evidence register.\n10. Track proposed redactions, confidentiality measures, objections, rulings,\n    admissions, agreed bundles, and exhibit status through the hearing.\n\n## Output\n\nProvide the master register, element-to-proof chart, witness and foundation map,\nadmissibility and objection schedule, contradiction matrix, gap list, exhibit\nlist, and bundle or hearing index.\n\n## Guardrails\n\nDo not alter originals, break custody, waive privilege, disclose protected\nmaterial, suppress exculpatory evidence, or assume production means admissibility.\nFlag illegal collection, integrity failures, missing context, and specialist\nforensic or expert needs immediately.\n"},"changes":[],"summary":"First saved snapshot. No earlier version is available for comparison.","summary_kind":"deterministic","summary_metadata":{}}