{"id":21091,"plugin_id":"plugins_6aac006819508191a02506fb32a88714","kind":"skill","collection_source":null,"comparison_source":null,"observed_at":"2026-09-30T23:16:48.063Z","digest":"4f6d65d544fe3590d3a5b00e3c0ba84abb666183854f66bde219ceeb9008c949","against":null,"payload":{"description":"Stress-test proposed autonomous CIO preparation against evidence changes, approval gaps and human-control failures. Use when the user needs autonomy stress test for CIO decision support.","included_files":[{"relative_path":"agents/openai.yaml","size_in_bytes":136}],"name":"autonomy-stress-test","skill_md_contents":"---\nname: autonomy-stress-test\ndescription: Stress-test proposed autonomous CIO preparation against evidence changes, approval gaps and human-control failures. Use when the user needs autonomy stress test for CIO decision support.\n---\n\n# Autonomy Stress Test\n\n## Mission\n\nFind where governed autonomy would fail before any action is treated as approval-ready.\n\n## Inputs\n\nAccept action ledgers, autonomy gates, decision packets, risk registers, approval notes, evidence gaps and policy constraints.\n\n## Workflow\n\n1. Identify proposed autonomous or semi-autonomous preparation steps.\n2. Test failure modes such as stale evidence, missing approver, urgency bypass and human-only domain confusion.\n3. Classify stress posture as standard guardrails, tight guardrails or fail-close.\n4. Define required safeguards before autonomy can increase.\n5. Keep the result as a decision-support artifact only.\n\n## Output Format\n\n- Executive Summary\n- Stress Score\n- Stress Posture\n- Stressors\n- Failure Modes\n- Required Safeguards\n- Human-Control Notes\n\n## Guardrails\n\nDo not authorize execution. Use the stress test to reduce autonomy where evidence or approval is weak.\n"},"changes":[],"summary":"First saved snapshot. No earlier version is available for comparison.","summary_kind":"deterministic","summary_metadata":{}}