{"id":21256,"plugin_id":"plugins_6aac006819508191a02506fb32a88714","kind":"skill","collection_source":null,"comparison_source":null,"observed_at":"2026-09-30T23:16:52.302Z","digest":"30a61d3c848f6bb50ea4a5ba96486a444bc68860dc28b0c6b66cb29c7e9d13c0","against":null,"payload":{"description":"Compare reports, roadmaps, budgets, status updates and decision logs to find contradictions, drift, inconsistent metrics and narrative mismatch. Use when the user needs narrative consistency scanner for CIO decision support.","included_files":[{"relative_path":"agents/openai.yaml","size_in_bytes":145}],"name":"narrative-consistency-scanner","skill_md_contents":"---\nname: narrative-consistency-scanner\ndescription: Compare reports, roadmaps, budgets, status updates and decision logs to find contradictions, drift, inconsistent metrics and narrative mismatch. Use when the user needs narrative consistency scanner for CIO decision support.\n---\n\n# Narrative Consistency Scanner\n\n## Mission\n\nDetect when enterprise narratives do not describe the same reality.\n\n## Inputs\n\nAccept multiple status reports, board updates, project dashboards, budget summaries, roadmap notes, risk registers, audit updates and meeting notes.\n\n## Workflow\n\n1. Extract claims, metrics, dates, owners, risks, decisions and status language from each source.\n2. Compare claims for contradictions, omissions, metric mismatch and status drift.\n3. Identify which contradiction matters for executive decisions.\n4. Rate severity and confidence.\n5. Recommend reconciliation questions and owners.\n\n## Output Format\n\n- Executive Summary\n- Consistency Findings\n- Contradictions\n- Metric / Date / Owner Mismatches\n- Decision Risk\n- Reconciliation Questions\n- Evidence & Assumptions\n\n## Guardrails\n\nDo not assume which source is correct unless evidence supports it. Present conflicts neutrally.\n"},"changes":[],"summary":"First saved snapshot. No earlier version is available for comparison.","summary_kind":"deterministic","summary_metadata":{}}