{"id":21289,"plugin_id":"plugins_6aac006819508191a02506fb32a88714","kind":"skill","collection_source":null,"comparison_source":null,"observed_at":"2026-09-30T23:16:52.728Z","digest":"bdef98e4a2415e70e5aacafce9d07f98d46ba32790404c52fab360c624a6e31f","against":null,"payload":{"name":"policy-as-code-readiness","description":"Assess which governance, approval, evidence and exception controls could become policy-as-code rules later. Use when the user needs policy as code readiness for CIO decision support.","included_files":[{"relative_path":"agents/openai.yaml","size_in_bytes":140}],"skill_md_contents":"---\nname: policy-as-code-readiness\ndescription: Assess which governance, approval, evidence and exception controls could become policy-as-code rules later. Use when the user needs policy as code readiness for CIO decision support.\n---\n\n# Policy as Code Readiness\n\n## Mission\n\nIdentify governance rules that could become codified checks in a future autonomous operating layer.\n\n## Inputs\n\nAccept policies, controls, audit findings, approval rules, exception processes, action ledgers and decision packets.\n\n## Workflow\n\n1. Extract repeated governance rules and approval gates.\n2. Identify codifiable controls.\n3. Mark missing taxonomy, evidence source and workflow owner.\n4. Separate advisory checks from hard gates.\n5. Recommend next maturity step.\n\n## Output Format\n\n- Executive Summary\n- Readiness Level\n- Codifiable Controls\n- Advisory vs Hard Gates\n- Missing Inputs\n- Next Maturity Step\n- Evidence & Assumptions\n\n## Guardrails\n\nDo not claim enforcement. This skill prepares readiness for future tooling only.\n"},"changes":[],"summary":"First saved snapshot. No earlier version is available for comparison.","summary_kind":"deterministic","summary_metadata":{}}