{"id":24014,"plugin_id":"plugins_6ab386e87e908191b3b75c565ea50bf8","kind":"skill","collection_source":null,"comparison_source":null,"observed_at":"2026-09-30T23:17:52.558Z","digest":"5ec733e2a4c8026b418a0d2413956865ead11b7d25ea2bc2b9aff9061b656bc2","against":null,"payload":{"name":"presentation-review","description":"Review a presentation for narrative flow, clarity, audience fit, evidence, and accessibility.","included_files":[],"skill_md_contents":"---\nname: presentation-review\ndescription: Review a presentation for narrative flow, clarity, audience fit, evidence, and accessibility.\n---\n# Presentation quality review\n\nReview supplied slide text or a description against the audience, purpose, and constraints. Prioritize issues in story flow, slide takeaway clarity, density, evidence quality, consistency, accessibility, and timing. Give specific slide-level fixes and a concise overall verdict. Distinguish missing evidence from false claims; never invent source details. For visuals or files not actually available, state the review limitation instead of implying inspection.\n"},"changes":[],"summary":"First saved snapshot. No earlier version is available for comparison.","summary_kind":"deterministic","summary_metadata":{}}