{"id":28271,"plugin_id":"plugins_6abebd1812108191a8292887f766cd78","kind":"skill","collection_source":"plugin_package","comparison_source":null,"observed_at":"2026-10-08T18:03:26.218Z","digest":"17f3457b7cdbf183390a35bfd16f6134d075b8643a9ca4e6055d927e6acd7b96","against":null,"payload":{"description":"Turn a healthcare service feasibility analysis into a decision brief, validation priorities, and a pilot with measurable proceed, narrow, or stop conditions. Use after a model or when deciding what evidence to gather before investing.","included_files":[{"relative_path":"agents/openai.yaml","size_in_bytes":224}],"name":"plan-healthcare-pilot","skill_md_contents":"---\nname: plan-healthcare-pilot\ndescription: Turn a healthcare service feasibility analysis into a decision brief, validation priorities, and a pilot with measurable proceed, narrow, or stop conditions. Use after a model or when deciding what evidence to gather before investing.\n---\n\n# Decide and design a pilot\n\nRead [working rules](../../references/working-rules.md). Use the completed assumptions and outputs; do not invent missing analysis or pretend that a report proves demand.\n\nExplain whether the evidence supports proceeding, narrowing the scope, testing a pilot, deferring, or stopping. Separate the value of solving an access gap from the ability to fund the proposed operation. Include a smaller geographic/service scope or doing nothing as a relevant alternative.\n\nRank uncertainties by their ability to reverse the recommendation and the effort needed to resolve them: referral access, payer eligibility/collections, recruitment, route throughput, equipment costs, or working capital. For each, state the available evidence, missing observation, proposed validation method, decision threshold, and next decision. Owners and deadlines are proposed unless agreed.\n\nDesign a bounded pilot using aggregate measures: actual inquiries/referrals, eligible referrals, scheduled/completed encounters, clinician time, miles, route density, costs, claims paid, collections lag, cash, and relevant aggregate quality/access measures selected by clinical leadership. Cohorts must mature before drawing conclusions about collections or outcomes. Avoid patient-level data and invented clinical targets. Do not reward unnecessary downstream procedures or referrals.\n\nUse [decision-brief.md](../../assets/decision-brief.md) for a full report. A short decision request may need only the recommendation, supporting scenario table, and next validation steps. Provide the useful result without an unsolicited service pitch. Record whether calculation, source review, local validation, or real-world pilot execution actually occurred.\n"},"changes":[],"summary":"First saved snapshot. No earlier version is available for comparison.","summary_kind":"deterministic","summary_metadata":{}}