{"id":67286,"plugin_id":"plugin_asdk_app_6abfdbcda5d081918f8ed5881b488dc2","kind":"skill","collection_source":"plugin_package","comparison_source":null,"observed_at":"2026-10-28T13:07:20.278Z","digest":"e2ebc50f194e12384d41cde161a86ec07fb71b193756bfa55da13fb209bf797d","against":null,"payload":{"description":"Prepare neutral human follow-up questions from an Ocolta categorical result or user-described concern, without deciding authenticity or eligibility.","included_files":[],"name":"ocolta-verification-follow-up","skill_md_contents":"---\nname: ocolta-verification-follow-up\ndescription: \"Prepare neutral human follow-up questions from an Ocolta categorical result or user-described concern, without deciding authenticity or eligibility.\"\n---\n\n# Plan source verification follow-up\n\nUse an actual Ocolta result or the user’s description of the concern. A connected purchase at https://app.ocolta.com/mcp can be identified with `get_connected_purchase`; use `list_recent_reviews` and `get_review_summary` for a recoverable owned result. Recovery is currently 24 hours after completion. If unavailable, say the plan is based on supplied information and give https://app.ocolta.com/workspace/integrations as the connection handoff.\n\nPreserve categorical status, priority, confidence, indicator counts and limitations. These fields do not expose the underlying document text or locate individual indicators; the user reviews the full report and source in the purchasing browser. Do not invent exact findings or reconstruct personal fields. An inconclusive or refused result supplies no authenticity determination, and a low-priority result does not prove a document is valid.\n\nAsk only for material context needed for a useful checklist, such as document type, decision being reviewed and the organization’s existing verification procedure. The checklist does not need account numbers, identity numbers, credentials or banking/payroll login details.\n\nPropose checking the source report against the actual file, considering ordinary explanations for artifacts, requesting an untouched original or appropriate adjacent period when needed, and verifying material facts through independently sourced institution contacts under the user’s applicable authorization procedure. Do not use an unverified contact printed on a questioned document as independent proof. Preserve uncertainty if the required source is unavailable.\n\nDraft neutral questions or a request for a clearer source only when asked. Keep observations and proposed checks separate from confirmed facts. The user follows their established review policy and records what was actually confirmed. This workflow does not contact anyone, verify account ownership, accuse a person, establish fraud/AI generation, or recommend approval, denial or reporting. A categorical result alone does not support such a decision.\n"},"changes":[],"summary":"First saved snapshot. No earlier version is available for comparison.","summary_kind":"deterministic","summary_metadata":{}}