{"id":77021,"plugin_id":"plugins_6ab41ed5b8c4819199eb5bbf91ce25f5","kind":"skill","collection_source":"plugin_package","comparison_source":null,"observed_at":"2026-11-03T00:12:19.240Z","digest":"d58a6afdbdf639385eee894e08a21c89c5f701e4813ea1860fca93e23bab3113","against":null,"payload":{"description":"Review a code diff, pull request or repository change for actual correctness, security, concurrency, test and compatibility risks.","included_files":[],"name":"review-code","skill_md_contents":"---\nname: review-code\ndescription: Review a code diff, pull request or repository change for actual correctness, security, concurrency, test and compatibility risks.\n---\n\n# Review Code\n\nUse this skill only for its stated purpose. Follow the shared source-of-truth, permission and evidence rules in `../../references/workflow-contract.md`. Read `../../references/code-review.md` for detailed method when necessary.\n\n## Procedure\n1. Read intent, diff, affected callers and nearby tests; identify what changed versus the baseline.\n2. Prioritize demonstrable defects and security/data/contract risks over style concerns.\n3. For each finding, provide grounded location, triggering input, consequence and concrete remediation.\n4. Mark blocking/important/suggestion severities and distinguish hypotheses requiring reproduction.\n5. If no issues found, state inspected scope and what was not tested; do not equate review with proof.\nDeliver a concise prioritized review; no speculative file references.\n\n## Handoff rule\nState actual artifacts or grounded code findings and validation status. Never invent file paths, executed tests, tool access, or completed subagent work. Keep output proportionate to the user request.\n"},"changes":[],"summary":"First saved snapshot. No earlier version is available for comparison.","summary_kind":"deterministic","summary_metadata":{}}