{"id":77653,"plugin_id":"plugins_6ae8cc5ee77c81918ab31ed7701a28de","kind":"skill","collection_source":"plugin_package","comparison_source":null,"observed_at":"2026-11-03T00:15:27.325Z","digest":"72715838069a51770109ea727fb078271bb45a96a95e9646c083239897994977","against":null,"payload":{"description":"Audit an implemented app or compare a rendered web/mobile interface with reference screenshots or a design specification; produce evidence-linked fixes.","included_files":[],"name":"review-visual-ux","skill_md_contents":"---\nname: review-visual-ux\ndescription: Audit an implemented app or compare a rendered web/mobile interface with reference screenshots or a design specification; produce evidence-linked fixes.\n---\n\n# Review Visual Ux\n\n1. Read `../../references/design-quality.md`, `../../references/reference-usage.md` and `../../references/testing-and-evidence.md`.\n2. Determine review target: user screenshot/Figma, existing app, or documented design spec. Capture actual render with available browser/simulator tools; if absent, perform a clearly labeled static code review only.\n3. Inspect information architecture, visual hierarchy, spacing, type, color roles, content density, image treatment, component consistency, input states, responsive/adaptive behavior, accessibility and reduced motion.\n4. Check at least: primary screen, one critical workflow state, small screen, large screen and one error/empty state where available. Record findings with severity, evidence, specific remedy and status.\n5. Never report objective pixel fidelity without a source image and comparable render. Do not substitute a synthetic design-quality score for screenshot comparison.\n6. If implementation changes are requested and authorized, apply bounded fixes, rerender and report before/after evidence. Preserve brand and existing structure unless redesign explicitly requested.\n"},"changes":[],"summary":"First saved snapshot. No earlier version is available for comparison.","summary_kind":"deterministic","summary_metadata":{}}