{"id":85700,"plugin_id":"plugin_asdk_app_6ae8d8410cc881919fe40cf76b3cc133","kind":"skill","collection_source":"plugin_package","comparison_source":null,"observed_at":"2026-11-07T06:14:53.301Z","digest":"504ee2e2548a107770522a76d12be13ae684b394bebdf5bf54c5d4c0014b4d8e","against":null,"payload":{"description":"Report what Vaquill AI actually holds for a jurisdiction, before you read an empty result as an absence of law. Subject: [state, or 'federal', or leave blank for everything].","included_files":[],"name":"coverage","skill_md_contents":"---\nname: coverage\ndescription: Report what Vaquill AI actually holds for a jurisdiction, before you read an empty result as an absence of law. Subject: [state, or 'federal', or leave blank for everything].\n---\n\nReport corpus coverage for whichever subject the conversation is about. If it is not clear from the conversation, ask for it before calling anything.\n\nCall `list_statutes_coverage`. It is free, so call it rather than inferring coverage from search results.\n\nRead two things off the response, and keep them separate:\n\n1. **`corpora`** - which corpus types this jurisdiction holds, and the document count for each. Coverage is per `(jurisdiction, corpusType)` pair, never per jurisdiction: a state can be complete in statutes and hold nothing in regulations.\n2. **`statusBreakdown`** - within each corpus, how those documents divide by status (`inForce`, `repealed`, `superseded`, `unknown` and so on). A large count is not a large count of operative law.\n\nThen answer the question the user actually has, which is almost always one of these:\n\n- **\"Is this a gap or an absence?\"** An empty search inside a corpus we hold means the provision is probably not there. An empty search for a corpus we do not hold means nothing at all about the law and must never be reported as \"no such provision\".\n- **\"How current is this?\"** Answer it for the specific section: `get_us_statute_section_text` returns the date the publisher states the text is current through, and `get_section_changes` lists the changes observed to that section.\n\nTwo things to state rather than assume:\n\n- **Read `measuredAt`.** This response is cached and can legitimately be hours old. If the user is making a decision on the counts, tell them when they were measured.\n- **A section count is not a statute count.** The per-jurisdiction total spans every corpus type, so a jurisdiction can hold tens of thousands of documents and zero statutes.\n\nIf the user landed here because a search came back empty, say explicitly which of the two cases they are in. That is the whole reason this command exists.\n"},"changes":[],"summary":"First saved snapshot. No earlier version is available for comparison.","summary_kind":"deterministic","summary_metadata":{}}