{"id":91752,"plugin_id":"plugin_asdk_app_6ae4a92e01708191bf58cf184d2f0108","kind":"skill","collection_source":"plugin_package","comparison_source":null,"observed_at":"2026-11-11T18:10:13.735Z","digest":"7d619d4ae25ff8917876276f56b0b2458c907f40f5fd307354c2b199f6a6c2d6","against":null,"payload":{"description":"Compare statutory rights or obligations across two or more named supported jurisdictions, including EU-versus-national law, employment, contractual liability and compliance requirements. Retrieve evidence for each jurisdiction and report differences and coverage gaps. Do not treat the absence of a search result as the absence of a rule.","included_files":[{"relative_path":"agents/openai.yaml","size_in_bytes":2314}],"name":"cross-border-comparison","skill_md_contents":"---\nname: cross-border-comparison\ndescription: Compare statutory rights or obligations across two or more named supported jurisdictions, including EU-versus-national law, employment, contractual liability and compliance requirements. Retrieve evidence for each jurisdiction and report differences and coverage gaps. Do not treat the absence of a search result as the absence of a rule.\nlicense: Proprietary\nmetadata:\n  author: Augment Ltd\n  version: \"1.3.14\"\n  compatibility: Requires the connected and authorised EULEX.AI MCP server.\n---\n\n# Compare jurisdictions\n\n1. Fix the common issue, countries, event date and entity/person context. Ask\n   only for missing facts that could change applicability. Confirm `list_scopes`.\n2. Research each requested jurisdiction independently in its legal language.\n   Use `search` with explicit scopes, then read the relevant complete articles.\n   Preserve each source's jurisdiction, article, version and official URL.\n3. Check status and temporal support. German snapshots are not historical\n   validity evidence; EU past-date article text is unavailable. Do not blend\n   dates or silently substitute current law for an event date.\n4. For a common EU directive, `eu_transposition` gives reported measures only.\n   Open the relevant national provisions before comparing operative obligations.\n5. Return a table: issue, jurisdiction, retrieved rule, qualifications/exceptions,\n   source and version. Explain practical differences after the table and identify\n   unresolved questions. Do not compare similarity scores or infer equivalence\n   merely because two provisions share a title.\n\nNever turn an unsupported country, empty search or missing exception into a\nstatement that no obligation exists. The output is comparative research, not a\nconclusion on which law governs the user's transaction.\n"},"changes":[],"summary":"First saved snapshot. No earlier version is available for comparison.","summary_kind":"deterministic","summary_metadata":{}}