plugin.json

{
  "$schema": "https://agent-plugins.org/schemas/1.0.0/plugin.schema.json",
  "name": "lawdiver-plugin-openai",
  "version": "1.0.1",
  "description": "Search and verify U.S. caselaw, statutes, and citations with LawDiver.",
  "author": {
    "name": "LawDiver",
    "email": "support@lawdiver.com",
    "url": "https://lawdiver.com"
  },
  "homepage": "https://lawdiver.com/products/mcp",
  "keywords": [
    "legal",
    "caselaw",
    "citations",
    "statutes",
    "research"
  ],
  "extensions": {
    "com.openai": {
      "interface": {
        "displayName": "LawDiver",
        "shortDescription": "Search and verify U.S. cases",
        "longDescription": "LawDiver lets ChatGPT search a verified U.S. federal and state caselaw corpus, retrieve case and statute text, check citations against the database, and report good-law / treatment signals so answers cite real authorities instead of invented ones.",
        "developerName": "LawDiver",
        "category": "Business & Operations",
        "capabilities": [
          "Search U.S. caselaw",
          "Retrieve case and statute text",
          "Check citations",
          "Check good-law status"
        ],
        "websiteURL": "https://lawdiver.com/products/mcp",
        "supportURL": "https://lawdiver.com/support",
        "privacyPolicyURL": "https://lawdiver.com/privacy",
        "termsOfServiceURL": "https://lawdiver.com/terms",
        "defaultPrompt": [
          "Using LawDiver, is 410 U.S. 113 still good law?",
          "Using LawDiver, search Ninth Circuit cases about qualified immunity.",
          "Using LawDiver, retrieve the text of 42 U.S.C. \u00a7 1983."
        ],
        "composerIcon": "./assets/icon.png",
        "logo": "./assets/logo.png"
      },
      "review": {
        "test_cases": {
          "positive": [
            {
              "description": "Jurisdiction-scoped caselaw search for a legal issue.",
              "prompt": "Using LawDiver, search Ninth Circuit cases about qualified immunity and summarize the top results with citations.",
              "tools_triggered": "search_cases",
              "expected_behavior": "Returns matching Ninth Circuit cases with names, citations, courts, dates, and snippets the assistant can summarize."
            },
            {
              "description": "Resolve a case citation and retrieve full opinion body text.",
              "prompt": "Using LawDiver, retrieve In re Estate of Carpenter, 253 So. 2d 697 (Fla. 1971), then get the full opinion text and summarize the court's undue-influence discussion with pin cites from the returned body.",
              "tools_triggered": "retrieve_case, get_opinion_text",
              "expected_behavior": "Resolves the case, then returns opinion.body text (paginating with nextOffset if truncated) that the assistant quotes for the undue-influence summary."
            },
            {
              "description": "Pull full statute section text by Bluebook citation.",
              "prompt": "Using LawDiver, retrieve the full text of 42 U.S.C. \u00a7 1983.",
              "tools_triggered": "retrieve_statute",
              "expected_behavior": "Returns the statute section body and identifying metadata for 42 U.S.C. \u00a7 1983 when present in the corpus."
            },
            {
              "description": "Verify a citation string against the corpus.",
              "prompt": "Using LawDiver, check whether the citation 347 U.S. 483 is a real case and whether it is still good law.",
              "tools_triggered": "check_citation",
              "expected_behavior": "Confirms corpus match status and, for case hits, includes treatment or good-law signals when available."
            },
            {
              "description": "List jurisdiction options then search one state.",
              "prompt": "Using LawDiver, list the available jurisdictions, then search California state cases about comparative negligence.",
              "tools_triggered": "list_jurisdictions, search_cases",
              "expected_behavior": "First returns jurisdiction codes, then California-scoped search hits with citations and snippets."
            }
          ],
          "negative": [
            {
              "description": "Refuse destructive corpus edits that LawDiver cannot perform.",
              "prompt": "Using LawDiver, delete Roe v. Wade from the caselaw database.",
              "expected_behavior": "The plugin does not claim the case was deleted. LawDiver tools are read-only and cannot modify or erase opinions."
            },
            {
              "description": "Do not treat LawDiver as a general non-legal web search.",
              "prompt": "Using LawDiver, find me the best restaurants near Times Square tonight.",
              "expected_behavior": "The plugin does not run caselaw tools for restaurant discovery. The request is outside supported legal research."
            },
            {
              "description": "Do not use LawDiver to draft or file court documents.",
              "prompt": "Using LawDiver, draft and e-file a motion for summary judgment in the Southern District of New York.",
              "expected_behavior": "The plugin is not used to draft or e-file. LawDiver only searches and retrieves existing legal authorities."
            }
          ]
        },
        "demo_recording_url": "https://lawdiver.com/lawdiver-video"
      },
      "publication": {
        "release_notes": "Initial directory submission. Search and verify U.S. caselaw, statutes, and citations through the LawDiver MCP server."
      },
      "apps": "./.app.json"
    }
  }
}