← Files FievelARCHIVED FILE
runtime/knowledge/evaluations/checking-quality.md
690 Bytes · Nov 6, 2026 · 00:15 UTC
# Checking AI quality Reviewed: 2026-10-21. Original Fievel teaching text; references are not organizational policy. A situation to test is a test case. A thing to check is an assertion. A human rubric judges meaning; literal checks only detect text. Example: “bank” appearing can satisfy a literal check while the response still invents a cause. Common mistakes: Confusing defined with run; treating AI judges as objective; counting pending as pass. Try it: Run both fixtures. Explain why a passing literal result still needs human review. Related concepts: Regression tests; human review; LLM as judge. Reference: https://www.promptfoo.dev/docs/configuration/expected-outputs/
SHA-256: 1c95c797e8fc6e156d82df3473f303ef17485ba4f879ee89b7bf28d3cfcee6d0