← Claude plugins
CLAUDE PLUGIN

claude-human-review

Publisher not specified · Claude Code

What this plugin does

claude-human-review adds a human approval gate at the end of every Claude Code turn that edits files. When Claude tries to stop, the plugin
pauses it and has Claude do two things before the turn ends. First, drop a one-line doc comment on any class, function, or non-obvious config
block it created or materially changed, using the right style per language (JSDoc for TS/JS, docstrings for Python, // for Go, and so on).
Second, write a short plain-English review of what changed and why, flagging risks the diff alone won't show.\n

You reply with 1 (Approve) to keep the changes or 2 (Undo) to roll them back. Undo is deterministic: filesystem snapshots are taken before
each edit, so it works in git repos, non-repos, and folders full of untracked files. State lives on disk, so it survives Claude's context
compaction on long sessions.\n

The review is tuned to stay around 60 to 120 words per turn and skips sections when they would be filler, so the extra output-token cost is
small. Inline comments are capped to one line per symbol and skipped entirely for trivial helpers, tests, and already-documented code. The
goal is a short lesson on your own codebase every time Claude edits it, not a wall of text.

Catalog observations

Sources
Community
Works with
Claude Code
Reported installs
Not provided
First observed
2026-10-03 22:13 UTC
Last observed
2026-10-07 12:00 UTC

Installation counts are reported by Claude Marketplace, not independently verified active users. Observation dates are not release dates. Pricing and account requirements must be checked with the publisher.

Install in Claude Code

Choose a source and review what the plugin adds before installing.

Community

/plugin marketplace add anthropics/claude-plugins-community
/plugin install claude-human-review@claude-community

Claude Code installation documentation

Source evidence

Listing and manifest JSON

Descriptions and compatibility labels come from the linked sources. Where both sources match, the GitHub description is used because web summaries may be shortened. We have not independently tested the declared capabilities.