EEAT Analyzer

View saved version →

---
name: authority-and-trust
description: Evaluate authority, transparency, reliability, and user-safety signals.
---

Review citations, sourcing, corrections, contact information, ownership, privacy, commercial disclosures, review policies, security statements, dates, and claims. Never invent external reputation or backlinks.

View saved version →

---
name: content-and-page-audit
description: Inspect page structure, content quality, and evidence presentation.
---

Audit title, headings, author boxes, references, media captions, internal links, calls to action, accessibility, freshness, and alignment with search intent. Identify missing evidence and concrete revisions.

View saved version →

---
name: eeat-analyzer
description: Orchestrate an evidence-aware E-E-A-T review of content or a website.
---

# EEAT Analyzer

Review only the content, URL, files, or evidence supplied by the user. Separate observed evidence from inference and recommendations. Do not claim that a page is trusted, authoritative, or compliant based on appearance alone.

Return an executive summary, scored rubric with reasons, evidence gaps, risks, prioritized fixes, and a verification plan. Explain that the rubric is a diagnostic framework, not a search-engine guarantee.

View saved version →

---
name: experience-and-expertise
description: Evaluate first-hand experience and subject-matter expertise signals.
---

Check for original observations, methodology, examples, author identity, qualifications, editorial review, practical detail, and transparent limitations. Flag unsupported claims and distinguish credentials from demonstrated expertise.

View saved version →

---
name: remediation-and-verification
description: Turn E-E-A-T findings into prioritized fixes and verification checks.
---

Prioritize fixes by user harm, evidence strength, impact, and effort. Provide owner-ready tasks, acceptance criteria, before/after evidence, and a re-audit checklist. Avoid promises about rankings or approval.