Glasser Competitor Research
Glasser v0.1.0
Research your competitors
From the developer
Declared capabilities
- Competitor profiles
- Funding research
- Hiring signals
Cost & access
Users connect an existing Glasser account with OAuth. The plugin has no checkout, subscription, top-up or upgrade flow.
Declared limitations
- Copywriting needs no research tools.
- General explanation needs no external data.
- The plugin cannot access other companies' accounts.
Onboarding example
Research linear.app as a competitor: positioning, funding, team and hiring.
Sources & dates
Developer declarations; not independently tested. Listing last checked Nov 12, 2026. Package observed Nov 12, 2026.
Description
From the marketplace listing
Research competitors from a name or domain. See who is behind a company, how it is funded, how it positions and prices its product, who leads it, what it is hiring for, how its website traffic and search visibility compare, and which Google ads it runs. Get one profile per competitor and a side-by-side comparison when you research several.
Language: English · Automatically detected from descriptions.
Changes
No changes recorded yet. Follow this plugin to keep track of future changes.
First seen Nov 12, 2026. Last seen Nov 12, 2026.
Similar plugins
Find competitors to follow as you develop your plugin.
-
Research keywords, analyze competitors, check search rankings, and track your own site's search traffic and ad spend with cited, up-to-da...
Shared terms: competitor, ads, google, position
-
Ubersuggest helps users research SEO opportunities from ChatGPT, including keyword ideas, domain and page traffic metrics, backlinks, SER...
Shared terms: research, domain, traffic, visibility
-
Connect DataFluxor to research Google search results and inspect public websites from ChatGPT. Tools cover organic SERP results, autocomp...
Shared terms: research, comparison, competitor, google
-
Keyword research for the App Store and Google Play, from the stores' own numbers. Ask ChatGPT which phrases a competitor ranks for, inclu...
Shared terms: research, ads, competitor, google
-
See how your prices compare to the competition without leaving ChatGPT. Turbodato monitors your products' prices across online retailers ...
Shared terms: competitor, per, position, price
Files & skills
File archives
Skill instructions
competitor-research8.15 KB
--- name: competitor-research description: When the user wants to understand a competitor in depth — who is behind it, how it is funded, what it sells and how it positions itself, what it hires for, where its traffic and search visibility come from, and where it advertises — or to compare several competitors side by side. Also use when the user mentions "competitor research", "competitive analysis", "who are our competitors", "compare us with", "what is [company] doing", "how much has [company] raised", "what is [company] hiring for", or gives competitor names or domains. Input is the competitors by name or domain, optionally the user's own product; output is one profile per competitor and a comparison when there are several. Runs on this plugin's Glasser Competitor Research tools. metadata: version: "0.1.0" category: research --- # Competitor research This skill uses this plugin's `glasser-competitor` MCP connection. Connect a Glasser account through the host's connection flow if the tools are unavailable. No CLI installation or other plugin is required. Use the dedicated tools below for all data. If they cannot supply a dimension, record it as missing. Do not require another plugin to complete a step. ## Inputs - the competitors, by name or domain - which dimensions matter (see the table below); the core set is the default - the user's own product, optional — with it the report can say what the findings mean for them; without it the profiles stand alone and the "What this means" sections are omitted If the user names their own product instead of competitors, the competitor set has to be settled before any research — use `find_similar_companies` for a shortlist and confirm it with the user; research on the wrong set costs more than the shortlist. ## Process ### 1. Resolve each competitor to one entity For each name, establish the canonical domain, the operating entity, and whether it is independent, a subsidiary, or a renamed or acquired product. Use `search_web` to find the official site and `inspect_company` to confirm the entity. Names collide; do not guess between genuinely ambiguous candidates — every later call keys off this. ### 2. Choose the dimensions Cost is competitors x dimensions, so do not run everything by default: - **Core** — positioning, funding, team, hiring. Cheap, high signal. - **On request** — traffic, SEO, ads, social, history. Estimate-based or priced per row; run when the question needs them. Before a series of calls, create one stable `task_id`, tell the user what you will run — the competitors, the dimensions and the tools, with their current charging rules from `quote_competitor_calls` — and get their go-ahead. That go-ahead covers the stated scope; ask again only before expanding it. ### 3. Collect, in parallel Only step 1 is a dependency. Past it every competitor-and-dimension pair stands alone, so fan out as wide as the environment allows. Settle the tool, provider and parameters once per dimension and apply the same choice to every competitor; different sources or limits make results incomparable. If a dimension has no tool, or is priced beyond what the user agreed to, record it as missing and move on — never fill a gap from memory. An empty result is not a gap; no funding on record is itself a finding. ## Dimensions and tools | Dimension | What to pull | Tool | Notes | |---|---|---|---| | **Identity** | canonical domain, entity name, status | `search_web`, `inspect_company` | Search listings are leads, not facts; confirm with the company profile. | | **Positioning** | homepage, pricing, product and customer pages | `read_page` | One URL per call, as markdown. | | **Funding** | rounds, amounts, dates, investors, total raised | `inspect_funding` | No recorded round is a finding, not proof the company never raised. | | **Team** | founders, executives, headcount | `list_team_members`, `inspect_company` | Founders by `job_titles`, executives by `seniorities`, as separate cal
Preview of the first 4,000 characters. Read full instructions →
Referenced files: 2 — file references are metadata, not package contents.
Package details
Publisher declarations from the archived package. These are separate from our research and the live service's terms.
- Package license
- MIT
- Package author
- Glasser
- Commerce declaration
- Does not support commerceThis does not establish whether access is free or paid.
- Review scenarios
- 5 positive · 3 negativeScenario counts, not test results.
Declared capabilities
- Competitor profiles
- Funding research
- Hiring signals
- Traffic and SEO
- Ad research
Package observed Nov 12, 2026.
Technical details
- First seen
- Nov 12, 2026 · 06:00 UTC
- Last seen
- Nov 12, 2026 · 12:00 UTC
- Collection status
- Collected
plugin_asdk_app_6ae321a36e9881918da3fe279e001225
Download plugin data (JSON)Plugin details: freshly prepared. Prepared . Refreshed when plugin data changes or after 6 hours. Your account and Follow status are live.