· 1 observation
Technical updates · 1
Package or technical metadata updated
View technical comparison →Ahmet Sahin v0.5.0
Settle decisions before coding
From the developer
Not specified in the available declarations: limitations, pricing & account requirements.
Use $settle to inspect this repository and help me decide what to improve.
Developer declarations; not independently tested. Listing last checked Nov 7, 2026. Package observed Nov 6, 2026.
From the marketplace listing
Read the repository, resolve material decisions through native question forms, confirm the scope, then implement and verify the result.
Language: English · Automatically detected from descriptions.
Exact text from the indicated source. A mention alone does not establish support for your task.
Interactive Write
Turn a rough repository idea into a decision-complete implementation: read the code first, then work the decision tree in rounds until nothing material is left assumed, and only then implement and verify.
· 1 observation
Package or technical metadata updated
View technical comparison →· 2 observations
Package or technical metadata updated
View technical comparison →· 2 observations
Package or technical metadata updated
View technical comparison →Package or technical metadata updated
View technical comparison →Find competitors to follow as you develop your plugin.
Uses the real vendored Impeccable workflow. Specialized for shaping UX and UI decisions and task structure before any interface code is w...
Shared terms: coding, decision, code
A related suite of compressed-communication and development workflow skills, including review, refactoring, exploration, evidence, and to...
Shared terms: coding, implementation, code
Create State gives ChatGPT persistent memory for your software projects. Save code snippets, architectural decisions, and debugging insig...
Shared terms: decision, left, code
Bind repository, CI, runtime and receipt evidence into signed graphs without changing target systems.
Shared terms: coding, repository, verify, code
Bind repository, CI, runtime and receipt evidence into signed graphs without changing target systems.
Shared terms: coding, repository, verify, read
--- name: settle description: Turn a rough idea or underspecified repository change into a decision-complete implementation by inspecting the codebase, discovering intent, resolving material decisions through evidence-backed rounds, then implementing and verifying. Use when the user invokes /groundwork:settle, /settle, or $settle with or without a task, or asks to be brainstormed, grilled, or questioned before coding. Do not use for explanation-only work or pure research. --- # Settle Turn an underspecified coding request into a decision-complete implementation, without making the user answer anything the repository can answer. ## Bare invocation When the skill is invoked without a task, treat that as a request to begin discovery, not as an activation check. Never answer that the skill is loaded, and never ask in prose what the user wants to change or build. Perform a bounded repository pass over project instructions, README and manifests, decision records or memory, and the newest relevant tests, outputs, or history. Then open the host-native question tool: - put two to four verified facts with source anchors in the assistant text immediately before the call, together with the labelled inference and the dependency map; - ask one root only when every other material decision genuinely depends on it; otherwise ask as much of the current frontier as the host's per-call cap holds; - when there is no honest root or frontier, offer two or three repository-grounded observable outcomes and let the client's free-form Other choice carry the user's direction. A bare invocation must reach the native question tool, not stop after reading this skill or inspecting the repository. ## Ground yourself first Read the project instructions, README, manifests, the code that owns the behavior, and its tests. Search by domain concept, not by the words in the request: something already built under another name turns a question into a statement. Read the newest decision record under `docs/decisions/` that covers the same flow, when one exists. A decision it settles is a repository closure anchored by the record's path, and is not asked again unless the code it describes has changed since; then say what changed and ask it once more. Finding the cause of the reported symptom ends your reading of *that* bug. It does not end the inquiry. Keep going until you can see what else the same code decides, because the second material decision is rarely mentioned in the request and is usually visible in the same file as the first. Separate what the repository states from what you concluded. Facts carry a path, test name, or constant. Conclusions are labelled as yours. ## Size the work Before the first question, place the request on one of three paths and say which in the text before the first call. This is a statement the user can overturn through the free-form choice, not a question. - **Bounded:** the flow being changed already exists in the repository. A new flag or option, a changed default or exit code, a bug fix, or a behavior change inside that flow is bounded, however many ways there are to build it. Run the rest of this skill as written, and never open an approach comparison here: a choice of mechanism inside a bounded change is an ordinary single-axis question. - **Architectural:** only when you can point at a structural marker: a new subsystem or service, a new public API or schema, a changed format of persistent state, a data migration, a trust boundary, or work spanning several repositories or seams. Where no flow exists yet — a new project, an empty directory — the work is architectural by definition. That several designs are conceivable is not a marker; name the marker when declaring this path. Compare approaches first, then run the rest of this skill on the approach chosen. - **Spike:** the requested output is an answer, not code that stays: "can we", "is it possible", "how expensive would". State
Preview of the first 4,000 characters. Read full instructions →
Referenced files: 1 — file references are metadata, not package contents.
Publisher declarations from the archived package. These are separate from our research and the live service's terms.
Package observed Nov 6, 2026.
plugins_6aa12ee03b2c8191a2130e8ddb9a54fc
Download plugin data (JSON)Plugin details: freshly prepared. Prepared . Refreshed when plugin data changes or after 6 hours. Your account and Follow status are live.