← Plugin catalog
Business & Operations

realLaw AI

realLaw AI v1.1.2

Search UAE legislation

Full description ↓

Save this plugin to Following and return to review observed changes. Follow up to 10 plugins free.

Description

From the marketplace listing

realLaw AI Legislation helps users research published UAE legislation directly in ChatGPT using natural-language questions in their preferred language. Search by legal topic, find specific laws by title or citation, filter results by jurisdiction, authority, document type, and field of law, explore legislation news and digests, and retrieve complete document text, available metadata, and links to the documents on realLaw AI. Legislation tools require a connected realLaw AI account with an active Professional or Team subscription. You can also check the connected account’s current access status.

Language: English · Automatically detected from descriptions.

What changed

realLaw AI

Oct 27, 2026 · 1 saved observations

Metadata · Oct 27, 2026 · 00:16 UTC · Compared with Oct 24, 2026 · 13:00 UTC

WHAT CHANGED

Package or technical metadata updated

Package or technical metadata updated

Observed in package metadata. These changes alone do not establish a new customer-facing feature.

Open full comparison.

Is v2 template

Before

Oct 24, 2026 · 13:00 UTC

Not present

After

Oct 27, 2026 · 00:16 UTC

false

Metadata: full comparison →
Earlier changes · 2 more observation days on this page
realLaw AI

Oct 3, 2026 · 4 saved observations

Pricing references

Instruction wording changed from “when a user asks factual questions about UAE legislation, legal compliance, tax rates, thresholds, exemptions, obligations, deadlines, penalties, or needs to find, review, compare, cite, or summarize published UAE legislation, legal news...” to “for factual UAE legislation, compliance, or tax questions and to find, review, compare, cite, or summarize published UAE legislation, news, or digests through realLaw AI. Also use for realLaw AI access, payments, renewals, and plan/accou...”. 18 additional added or edited lines are in the evidence.

Skill evidence →
Pricing references

Full description changed from “review legislation news and digests, and retrieve full document text, related metadata, and source links.” to “explore legislation news and digests, and retrieve complete document text, available metadata, and links to the documents on realLaw AI. Legislation tools require a connected realLaw AI account with an active Professional or Team subscri...”.

Metadata evidence →Listing evidence →
Technical updates

Package contents changed in 2 files: .codex-plugin/plugin.json, skills/uae-legislation-research/SKILL.md. Open the file diff to inspect the edits.

Files evidence →

Competitor profile

From the developer’s listing and package; capabilities are not independently tested. Package observed Nov 2, 2026.

Declared capabilities

Search UAE legislation

Declared limitations

Specific limitations have not been established. Missing information does not mean unrestricted capabilities.

Cost & access

Pricing and account requirements have not been established from the available package declarations. Unknown pricing does not mean free access.

Starter prompt

Find Federal Decree-Law No. 47 of 2022, summarize its key provisions, and link to the document.

View package source →

Matches for “UAE”

Exact text from the indicated source. A mention alone does not establish support for your task.

Publisher subtitle

Search UAE legislation

Publisher description

realLaw AI Legislation helps users research published UAE legislation directly in ChatGPT using natural-language questions in their preferred language. Search by legal topic, find specific laws by title or citation, filter results by jurisdiction, authority, document type, and field of law, explore legislation news and digests, and retrieve complete document text, available metadata, and links to the documents on realLaw AI. Legislation tools require a connected realLaw AI account with an active Professional or Team subscription. You can also check the connected account’s current access status.

Files & skills

File archives

Plugin package4 files · 4.48 KBBrowse files →
Skill instructions
uae-legislation-research8.11 KB

View saved version →

---
name: uae-legislation-research
description: Use for factual UAE legislation, compliance, or tax questions and to find, review, compare, cite, or summarize published UAE legislation, news, or digests through realLaw AI. Also use for realLaw AI access, payments, renewals, and plan/account changes, including user retries after access denial.
---

# UAE Legislation Research

Use realLaw AI for published UAE legislation evidence and answer in the user's language.

## Core rules

- Check scope before routing: call no tools for requests solely about non-UAE legislation, unrelated tasks, or amending/publishing laws, even if a law is named. Explain scope. For mixed requests, handle only the requested supported UAE research or realLaw AI access part.
- Write the final answer in the user's language, but send concise English search phrases to tools.
- When realLaw AI is selected, mentioned, or this skill is invoked, retrieve evidence before answering substantive UAE legislation, compliance, or tax questions. Never answer them from model memory alone; retrieve each concept in a multi-topic question.
- Preserve official titles, law numbers, years, and citations. Do not invent an official translation.
- Omit the deprecated `language` parameter from legislation tool calls. All legislation tools use the English corpus; translate retrieved English evidence only in the final answer.
- Ordinary factual questions, summaries, explanations, comparisons, citations, and news or digest presentations require complete retrieval of every selected or presented document through `hasMore=false`.
- If intent is ambiguous, treat it as content-bearing and completely retrieve every selected or presented document.
- Complete retrieval may be skipped only when the user explicitly requests metadata-only output limited to `title`, `sourceRef`, `releaseDate`, and `sourceUrl`. Return only those fields; `createdAt` is not part of this exception.
- Snippets and compact matches are discovery-only. Use them to identify, rank, or discard candidates, not for content or direct relevance claims.
- Do not infer missing metadata, legal effect, or identity. If no relevant document can be completely retrieved, say the corpus could not verify the answer; do not substitute model memory or the public web unless separately requested.
- Cite every substantive conclusion and each presented document with a clickable Markdown link to its returned `sourceUrl`, including metadata-only lists. Use the document title as the link label; never construct or alter the URL.
- If a tool reports that an active Professional or Team subscription is required, relay that message to the user and stop the current legislation retrieval attempt; do not try other legislation tools or answer from memory.

## Check access

- For realLaw AI access questions, reported payment/renewal/plan/account changes, or a later user retry after denial (even repeating the original question), call `get_access_status` once (OAuth required, no paid plan needed). Never reuse an earlier denial to refuse a later attempt.
- On `accessAllowed=true`, resume the original request if supported and pending, without another confirmation; for access-only questions report status only. On false, relay the current denial and stop without polling; a later user retry gets a fresh check. On technical error, access is unverified, not inactive.
- Checks use the OAuth-linked account; website login changes do not relink it. Ordinary legislation calls check access themselves.

## Route the request

- Exact title, number, year, issue number, or citation: `find_law_document_by_reference`.
- Latest or topic updates, news, digests: `get_legislation_news_digests`.
- Other factual questions or topics: `search_legislation_keywords`, then `search_legislation`.
- Resolve corpus filters with `list_legislation_filters`; read selected documents completely with `get_law_document`.

## Search topics and filters

1. Extract topic, mandatory constraints, dates, and output. `search_legislation` requires `query`; ask when a filtered request has no topic.
2. Translate to short English legal phrases and split multi-part questions into two to four concepts. Discover each with `search_legislation_keywords`; use only matching returned keywords.
3. Resolve uncertain filters with `list_legislation_filters`, mapping `jurisdiction`, `authority`, `documentType`, and `fieldOfLaw` to their plural search arrays.
4. Pass returned keys exactly in `authorities`, `jurisdictions`, `documentTypes`, and `fieldsOfLaw` (not `fieldOfLaws`); never send frontend parameters such as `zone[]` or `authority[]`. Never invent an ID: a well-formed unknown ID is not rejected, it silently returns no results.
5. Supported `statuses`: `in_force`, `not_in_force`, `will_come_into_force`; `contentTypes`: `laws_and_regulations`. Preserve dates and separate phrases that would over-constrain one query.
6. For laws and regulations, set `contentTypes=["laws_and_regulations"]`; omit for other content. Select by subject and mandatory constraints, not rank alone. Individual dismissal notices do not answer a request for general employment rules.

## Handle special routes

- For news without a topic, omit digest `query`. For topic news, use concise English and preserve `fromDate` and `toDate`; without dates the tool uses the last 14 calendar dates, including today.
- Treat `topicCandidates` as unverified discovery candidates. Completely retrieve every candidate selected for presentation before calling it a direct topic match or describing its content. Discarded candidates do not require complete retrieval.
- Always include compact `recentDigests`; topic `query` never filters it. Completely retrieve each presented digest unless the four-field metadata-only exception applies.
- If `noTopicCandidatesMessageRequired=true`, or no candidate remains relevant after complete inspection, state that no direct matches were found and label `recentDigests` as broader period coverage, never direct matches.
- When `recentDigestsTruncated=true`, disclose that additional digest documents exist beyond the returned limit.
- Use `period.dateField=releaseDate`: `releaseDate` is the issue date; `createdAt` is the edition-record creation timestamp, not the issue date.
- An exact reference match is identity metadata, not text. Completely retrieve it before ordinary use or presentation unless the four-field metadata-only exception applies.
- Select an ambiguous reference only when title, number, and year establish the match; otherwise clarify or offer related-topic search.

## Read document text

1. Call `get_law_document` with the returned `documentRef` and `maxCharacters: 50000`; omit `language` and omit `cursor` on the first call.
2. While `hasMore: true`, pass `nextCursor` unchanged with the same arguments.
3. Continue until `hasMore: false`; never stop because a fragment appears sufficient, even for a specific provision.
4. Do not use or present any document-based content claim before `hasMore: false`.
5. On `invalid_cursor`, restart that document from the first fragment with no `cursor`. On `not_found`, or when client limits prevent completion, state that the full document was not retrieved and omit all content claims based on its partial fragments.
6. Keep cursors internal. Link only the returned `sourceUrl`; never derive a URL.

## Recover from weak results

1. Retry weak results with simpler legal synonyms, validated phrases, and verified filter keys. Relax at most one optional filter; never relax a mandatory constraint silently.
2. If a citation remains unresolved, report that. Search related documents only with consent; otherwise ask for a narrower topic, citation, authority, jurisdiction, or date range.
3. A call rejected for invalid parameters is an argument error, not an empty corpus. Correct the reported argument using the tool schema and retry once. Use `list_legislation_filters` only when filter keys need resolving, not for invalid dates, `language`, `limit`, `maxCharacters`, or missing `query`.
4. For a digest date-range error, ensure `fromDate` is no later than `toDate`. Correct a transcription mistake from the user's request; if the requested interval itself is reversed or unclear, ask for clarification instead of silently changing it.

Referenced files: 1 — file references are metadata, not package contents.

Package details

Publisher declarations from the archived package. These are separate from our research and the live service's terms.

Package author
realLaw AI

Package observed Nov 2, 2026.

Technical details
First seen
Sep 30, 2026 · 22:02 UTC
Last seen
Nov 3, 2026 · 12:00 UTC
Latest observed change
Oct 3, 2026 · 00:02 UTC
Collection status
Collected

plugin_asdk_app_6a6a493a24a88191a8ed75b4ae8f9f3b

Download plugin data (JSON)