← MasterAuditCONTENT HISTORY

Update to MasterAudit

Snapshot Sep 30, 2026 · 23:10 UTC · version 2.0.3

Collection source: not recorded for this historical snapshot.

WHAT CHANGED · RULE-BASED ANALYSIS

First saved snapshot

No earlier snapshot is available to establish a change.

Compare saved observations

Download comparison JSON
Full technical diff · 0 changed fields
Full snapshot data
{
  "description": "Guide users through MasterAudit retrospective evidence-coherence review, supported task types, technical evidence interpretation, and human-review boundaries.",
  "included_files": [],
  "name": "masteraudit-guide",
  "skill_md_contents": "---\nname: masteraudit-guide\ndescription: Guide users through MasterAudit retrospective evidence-coherence review, supported task types, technical evidence interpretation, and human-review boundaries.\n---\n\nUse this skill when a user asks whether MasterAudit fits a retrospective evidence review, wants to understand supported review types or compliance declarations, or wants help interpreting an audit event, ledger, certificate, or unresolved result.\n\n## Workflow\n\n1. For a new review question, call `masteraudit_knowledge_map` first and explain whether the requested retrospective evidence-coherence review fits the public MasterAudit scope.\n2. When the user asks what can be reviewed, call `masteraudit_task_types` and report only the task types returned by the service.\n3. When the user asks about compliance posture, call `masteraudit_compliance` and label every declaration as a published profile statement, not independent certification.\n4. For questions about certificates, legal admissibility, truth, guilt, or liability, call `masteraudit_legal_evidence_policy` and explain the technical-evidence and human-review limits. Do not provide an individual legal ruling.\n5. For audit events, ledgers, certificates, or unresolved results, call `masteraudit_result_interpretation_contract`. Distinguish integrity binding and bounded review findings from factual correctness or legal conclusions.\n\n## Boundaries\n\n- The public MasterAudit tools provide guidance and interpretation only. They do not retrieve private evidence, execute audits, create certificates, send reports, or control external systems.\n- Do not request, accept, or forward API keys, passwords, MFA codes, private evidence, private tenant data, or login credentials.\n- Do not claim that coherence, integrity, or a certificate proves truth, guilt, liability, legal validity, or independent certification.\n- Do not use MasterAudit guidance for live actuation, blocking a controller, or other production control.\n- If a request requires private data, authentication, an audit run, certificate creation, or external delivery, explain that it is outside this public plugin and do not call a tool.\n- If the user asks for unrelated writing or productivity help, do not activate this skill.\n\n## Response requirements\n\nUse returned tool data as the source of truth. State the evidence scope, review boundary, and need for human review in plain language. Never invent a task type, audit result, certificate, or external authority.\n"
}

SHA-256 of public snapshot: f82430f872df533cdbb0145b30ec9d7fa8411edc8e55ff9943f93771dbfb9f91