← LinkedIn Animated InfographicsCONTENT HISTORY

Update to LinkedIn Animated Infographics

Snapshot Sep 30, 2026 · 23:14 UTC · version 3.7.0

Collection source: not recorded for this historical snapshot.

WHAT CHANGED · RULE-BASED ANALYSIS

First saved snapshot

No earlier snapshot is available to establish a change.

Compare saved observations

Download comparison JSON
Full technical diff · 0 changed fields
Full snapshot data
{
  "description": "Use host-native Python for deterministic file processing, package inspection, hashing, validation, and other executable verification when Python is actually available.",
  "included_files": [],
  "name": "sandbox-python-executor",
  "skill_md_contents": "---\nname: sandbox-python-executor\ndescription: Use host-native Python for deterministic file processing, package inspection, hashing, validation, and other executable verification when Python is actually available.\n---\n\n# Sandbox Python Executor\n\nUse the current ChatGPT/Codex host's Python execution capability to produce evidence. This Skill is not an MCP server and does not grant a runtime by itself.\n\n## Execute Python when it adds evidence\n\nUse host-native Python for work such as:\n\n- parsing or comparing JSON and generated reports\n- inspecting ZIP archives and package boundaries\n- computing SHA-256 or other deterministic hashes\n- checking file trees, duplicate names, or path safety\n- validating SVG/XML or structured output\n- transforming user-provided files when local Python is the appropriate tool\n- reproducing a deterministic bug or calculation\n- running reviewed local validators when the surrounding workflow permits execution\n\nDo not invoke Python just to rewrite prose or simulate a check that can be performed with a narrower host capability.\n\n## Execution contract\n\nWhen Python is available:\n\n1. actually execute the operation before claiming a result\n2. prefer reviewed bundled logic or small deterministic checks over arbitrary untrusted scripts\n3. inspect target-repository scripts before running them\n4. keep repository access read-only unless the user authorized mutation\n5. do not assume sandbox internet access\n6. do not expose secrets, tokens, credentials, or unrelated user files\n7. preserve generated artifacts the user needs and report their real path/reference\n8. include enough evidence to distinguish an executed check from a proposed command\n\n## Infographic jobs\n\nPython may be useful for:\n\n- verifying dimensions, frame manifests, asset hashes, and identity provenance\n- inspecting generated package archives\n- checking deterministic export metadata\n- comparing before/after structured QA reports\n- validating file naming and output boundaries\n\nPython does not replace visual inspection. A mathematically valid artifact can still fail narrative, hierarchy, typography, identity, or feed-scale visual QA.\n\n## Evidence to report\n\nReport the relevant subset of:\n\n- operation executed\n- pass/fail status\n- important counts or findings\n- generated path/reference\n- SHA-256 when package or asset identity matters\n- warnings and checks that could not be executed\n\nNever fabricate stdout, hashes, paths, test counts, generated files, or tool availability.\n\n## If Python is unavailable\n\nDo not claim Python, tests, package validation, hashing, or file transformation occurred. Continue with static inspection only where sufficient and mark execution-dependent conclusions as unverified or `HOLD`."
}

SHA-256 of public snapshot: 3ff4f2fb3e996b280200243d081f0fbcb2c86f3e2df829562fdf954a6d3e9cff