Update to WSH Risk Assessment

{
  "description": "Convert accepted WSH risk-assessment gaps or recommendations into an implementation and effectiveness-verification plan. Use for hierarchy-of-control selection, owners, deadlines, interim protection, evidence, and residual-risk confirmation; do not treat planned controls as implemented.",
  "included_files": [],
  "name": "wsh-risk-control-planning",
  "skill_md_contents": "---\nname: wsh-risk-control-planning\ndescription: Convert accepted WSH risk-assessment gaps or recommendations into an implementation and effectiveness-verification plan. Use for hierarchy-of-control selection, owners, deadlines, interim protection, evidence, and residual-risk confirmation; do not treat planned controls as implemented.\n---\n\n# Plan and Verify Risk Controls\n\nStart from accepted hazards, review findings, or control gaps. Do not reopen the whole RA unless a proposed control introduces a new hazard or exposes a material causal gap.\n\n## Planning rules\n\n- Consider elimination, substitution, engineering, administrative controls, then PPE.\n- Explain when a higher-order option is not selected.\n- Specify owner, target date, interim measures, dependencies, implementation evidence, effectiveness measure, reviewer, and review date.\n- Identify new hazards and change-management actions.\n- Keep current, projected residual, and confirmed residual risk separate.\n- Do not mark a control effective from planning, purchasing, attendance, or installation evidence alone.\n\n## Output table\n\n| Action ID | Hazard / RA row | Required control | Hierarchy level | Owner | Target date | Interim protection | Dependencies | Implementation evidence | Effectiveness measure and acceptance criterion | Reviewer / review date | Status | Projected residual risk | Confirmed residual risk |\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n\nUse `Not yet verified` until effectiveness evidence is available. Do not invent escalation thresholds.\n"
}