← Claus Argos Skill OSCONTENT HISTORYWHAT CHANGED · RULE-BASED ANALYSIS
Update to Claus Argos Skill OS
Snapshot Sep 30, 2026 · 23:14 UTC · version 1.16.0
Collection source: not recorded for this historical snapshot.
First saved snapshot
No earlier snapshot is available to establish a change.
Compare saved observations
Download comparison JSONFull technical diff · 0 changed fields
Full snapshot data
{
"name": "audit-property-due-diligence",
"description": "Audit the completeness, consistency, and risk coverage of property due diligence before purchase, investment, lending, conversion, major renovation, or sale. Use when the user wants a strict evidence gate. Do not perform legal, tax, valuation, environmental, structural, surveying, or code certification and do not fill missing evidence with assumptions.",
"included_files": [
{
"relative_path": "agents/openai.yaml",
"size_in_bytes": 263
}
],
"skill_md_contents": "---\nname: audit-property-due-diligence\ndescription: Audit the completeness, consistency, and risk coverage of property due diligence before purchase, investment, lending, conversion, major renovation, or sale. Use when the user wants a strict evidence gate. Do not perform legal, tax, valuation, environmental, structural, surveying, or code certification and do not fill missing evidence with assumptions.\n---\n\n# Property Due Diligence Auditor\n\n## Workflow\n\n1. Define transaction, jurisdiction, property, parties, intended use, materiality, deadline, data room, and professional workstreams.\n2. Inventory inspected evidence and identify authoritative, draft, stale, unsigned, inconsistent, inaccessible, or missing items.\n3. Check applicable streams: title and rights; planning and lawful use; leases and occupancy; condition and structure; building services; fire and life safety; environmental and hazards; energy; boundaries and access; utilities; insurance; tax inputs; operating history; contracts; disputes; finance; and exit restrictions.\n4. Trace each material claim in the investment or project case to evidence, date, scope, and responsible professional.\n5. Classify findings as blocker, high, medium, low, or not assessable. Distinguish missing evidence from an adverse finding.\n6. Do not waive a condition or recommend completion; define the decision or professional confirmation required.\n\n## Required output\n\n- Scope and inspected-evidence register\n- Due-diligence coverage matrix\n- Critical blockers and contradictions\n- Missing and stale evidence\n- Questions by responsible professional\n- Readiness status: ready / conditional / not ready / not assessable\n"
}SHA-256: d3ab206aea07dfe1627b92c919b859417c906cc1a0e14f0b37486a4dc1746fc5