← Claus Argos Skill OSCONTENT HISTORY

Update to Claus Argos Skill OS

Snapshot Sep 30, 2026 · 23:14 UTC · version 1.16.0

Collection source: not recorded for this historical snapshot.

WHAT CHANGED · RULE-BASED ANALYSIS

First saved snapshot

No earlier snapshot is available to establish a change.

Compare saved observations

Download comparison JSON
Full technical diff · 0 changed fields
Full snapshot data
{
  "description": "Compare hold, rent, refinance preparation, phased completion, partnership, partial disposal, as-is sale, limited-work sale, and completed sale scenarios for a property. Use when an owner faces a strategic property decision. Do not select an option using fabricated market values or override the owner's risk, tax, legal, or personal constraints.",
  "included_files": [
    {
      "relative_path": "agents/openai.yaml",
      "size_in_bytes": 249
    }
  ],
  "name": "compare-property-exit-scenarios",
  "skill_md_contents": "---\nname: compare-property-exit-scenarios\ndescription: Compare hold, rent, refinance preparation, phased completion, partnership, partial disposal, as-is sale, limited-work sale, and completed sale scenarios for a property. Use when an owner faces a strategic property decision. Do not select an option using fabricated market values or override the owner's risk, tax, legal, or personal constraints.\n---\n\n# Property Scenario Decision Engine\n\n## Workflow\n\n1. Define the decision, owner objectives, minimum liquidity, deadlines, reversibility needs, debt and partner constraints, tax-review needs, and protected outcomes.\n2. Establish a common evidence date and consistent assumptions for condition, remaining cost, time, rent, operating cost, financing, sale value, transaction cost, and taxes as supplied.\n3. Model each genuinely available option on upfront cash, peak funding, monthly exposure, time to cash, expected net proceeds or income, downside, execution complexity, and confidence.\n4. Exclude options that fail a safety, permission, title, funding, contractual, or professional feasibility gate.\n5. Run sensitivities and identify the exact breakpoints at which rankings change.\n6. Present dominated options, irreversible choices, information value, and the cheapest next evidence that could change the decision.\n\n## Required output\n\n- Comparable scenario table\n- Preconditions and disqualifying gates\n- Liquidity, value, time, and risk comparison\n- Breakpoint analysis\n- Decision matrix reflecting owner priorities\n- Unresolved professional and evidence requirements\n\n"
}

SHA-256 of public snapshot: 055f173dc5f516a2960df818cb64629a850a7b3cb2d0b959851986cb6f84c1f4