Update to Session Chronicle

{
  "description": "Compare two or more conference or session transcripts, chronicles, or summaries across themes, speaker positions, convergence, divergence, evidence, and implications. Use for cross-session synthesis and comparison; do not use for a single-session recap.",
  "included_files": [],
  "name": "session-compare",
  "skill_md_contents": "---\nname: session-compare\ndescription: Compare two or more conference or session transcripts, chronicles, or summaries across themes, speaker positions, convergence, divergence, evidence, and implications. Use for cross-session synthesis and comparison; do not use for a single-session recap.\n---\n\n# Session Compare\n\nBuild an evidence-grounded synthesis across supplied sessions. Do not manufacture symmetry, conflict, or consensus merely to complete a comparison framework.\n\n## Workflow\n\n1. Confirm that at least two distinguishable source units are available; identify their titles or neutral labels.\n2. Assess comparability: topic, purpose, participants, format, date, and level of detail. State material limitations.\n3. Create an evidence map for recurring themes and session-specific concerns. Keep absence of discussion distinct from disagreement.\n4. Compare positions with cautious attribution using [attribution guidance](../../references/attribution-guidance.md).\n5. Report supported convergence, divergence, complementary emphasis, and unresolved questions.\n6. Derive implications only when warranted, labeling interpretations as synthesis rather than source claims.\n\nUse a narrative, matrix, or hybrid structure according to the number and complexity of sessions. Cite or point to transcript evidence precisely enough that the comparison can be checked. Preserve meaningful outliers rather than forcing a majority story.\n"
}