Update to Conversational Narrative

{
  "description": "Use when auditing or rewriting a technical or practitioner post that feels AI-written, over-polished, repetitive, over-structured, or unlike the demonstrated speaker while preserving meaning, evidence, and useful roughness.",
  "included_files": [
    {
      "relative_path": "references/anti-patterns.md",
      "size_in_bytes": 1533
    },
    {
      "relative_path": "references/pattern-engine.md",
      "size_in_bytes": 2082
    },
    {
      "relative_path": "references/quality-rubric.md",
      "size_in_bytes": 992
    },
    {
      "relative_path": "references/routing-map.json",
      "size_in_bytes": 852
    },
    {
      "relative_path": "references/voice-profile.md",
      "size_in_bytes": 2615
    }
  ],
  "name": "voice-fidelity-reviewer",
  "skill_md_contents": "---\nname: voice-fidelity-reviewer\ndescription: Use when auditing or rewriting a technical or practitioner post that feels AI-written, over-polished, repetitive, over-structured, or unlike the demonstrated speaker while preserving meaning, evidence, and useful roughness.\n---\n\n# Voice Fidelity Reviewer\n\nRepair residue without sanitizing the person.\n\n## Priority\n\n1. factual and numeric fidelity\n2. current user intent\n3. demonstrated voice in supplied samples\n4. natural thought movement\n5. readability\n6. polish\n\nPolish comes last.\n\n## Audit\n\nLook for:\n\n- repeated binary reframes\n- generic insight sentences\n- textbook headings\n- decorative English\n- repeated “this is important” instructions\n- fake certainty\n- vague expert or source references\n- duplicated conclusions\n- generic engagement bait\n- uniform paragraph geometry\n- every paragraph trying to sound quotable\n- excessive reader check-ins\n- humor added where the source voice would stay serious\n\nAlso identify useful roughness that must stay.\n\n## Rewrite rules\n\n- Preserve the original thesis and supplied proof.\n- Cut repeated ideas, not repeated emphasis that carries timing or identity.\n- Replace polished professional filler with the speaker's normal vocabulary.\n- Vary paragraph rhythm naturally.\n- Keep professional English terms that belong to the work.\n- If a claim is stronger than the evidence, qualify it.\n- Do not invent a personal anecdote to make the draft feel human.\n\n## Output\n\nIf the user asks only for a rewrite, return the revised draft without an audit report.\n\nIf the user asks for analysis, provide the smallest useful audit followed by the revised version when requested.\n"
}