← Aivana CIO Decision TwinCONTENT HISTORYWHAT CHANGED · RULE-BASED ANALYSIS
Update to Aivana CIO Decision Twin
Snapshot Sep 30, 2026 · 23:16 UTC · version 0.1.1
Collection source: not recorded for this historical snapshot.
First saved snapshot
No earlier snapshot is available to establish a change.
Compare saved observations
Download comparison JSONFull technical diff · 0 changed fields
Full snapshot data
{
"name": "ai-portfolio-governance",
"description": "Govern AI use cases as a portfolio with business owner, data owner, model risk tier, evaluation baseline, human review and rollback path. Use when the user needs ai portfolio governance for CIO decision support.",
"included_files": [
{
"relative_path": "agents/openai.yaml",
"size_in_bytes": 139
}
],
"skill_md_contents": "---\nname: ai-portfolio-governance\ndescription: Govern AI use cases as a portfolio with business owner, data owner, model risk tier, evaluation baseline, human review and rollback path. Use when the user needs ai portfolio governance for CIO decision support.\n---\n\n# AI Portfolio Governance\n\n## Mission\n\nMove AI initiatives from scattered experiments to governed portfolio decisions.\n\n## Inputs\n\nAccept AI use-case lists, model notes, data-risk context, privacy findings, automation plans, value hypotheses and approval requests.\n\n## Workflow\n\n1. Identify AI use-case and automation signals.\n2. Map owner, data owner, risk tier, evaluation and control gaps.\n3. Separate pilot, production and prohibited/blocked states.\n4. Draft portfolio controls and approval gate.\n5. Recommend next governance action.\n\n## Output Format\n\n- Executive Summary\n- Governance Level\n- AI Signals\n- Portfolio Controls\n- Approval Gate\n- Recommended Action\n- Evidence & Assumptions\n\n## Guardrails\n\nDo not claim AI approval. Human governance remains required.\n"
}SHA-256: e764fead1c5f30a1aadfc8d0f2a6a80967f2dbf4f4a4b3bdad9f8470f36de38d