← Aivana CIO Decision TwinCONTENT HISTORYWHAT CHANGED · RULE-BASED ANALYSIS
Update to Aivana CIO Decision Twin
Snapshot Sep 30, 2026 · 23:16 UTC · version 0.1.1
Collection source: not recorded for this historical snapshot.
First saved snapshot
No earlier snapshot is available to establish a change.
Compare saved observations
Download comparison JSONFull technical diff · 0 changed fields
Full snapshot data
{
"name": "autonomy-risk-budget",
"description": "Budget how much autonomous preparation is acceptable based on risk level, missing evidence, human-only actions and approval needs. Use when the user needs autonomy risk budget for CIO decision support.",
"included_files": [
{
"relative_path": "agents/openai.yaml",
"size_in_bytes": 136
}
],
"skill_md_contents": "---\nname: autonomy-risk-budget\ndescription: Budget how much autonomous preparation is acceptable based on risk level, missing evidence, human-only actions and approval needs. Use when the user needs autonomy risk budget for CIO decision support.\n---\n\n# Autonomy Risk Budget\n\n## Mission\n\nKeep governed autonomy bounded by risk, evidence and human-control requirements.\n\n## Inputs\n\nAccept action ledgers, autonomy gates, risk levels, missing evidence, decision packets and operating reviews.\n\n## Workflow\n\n1. Count high-risk, medium-risk and human-only actions.\n2. Include missing-evidence pressure.\n3. Estimate budget used and remaining.\n4. Define autonomy posture: Available, Guarded or Constrained.\n5. State the rule for increasing or limiting autonomy.\n\n## Output Format\n\n- Executive Summary\n- Budget Used\n- Remaining Budget\n- Risk Drivers\n- Autonomy Posture\n- Budget Rule\n- Evidence & Assumptions\n\n## Guardrails\n\nThis limits autonomy; it does not authorize external execution.\n"
}SHA-256: c2e9672f295a7ae160469a0b018d20b226331c17d928ab98b859892b1823420d