← Aivana CIO Decision TwinCONTENT HISTORYWHAT CHANGED · RULE-BASED ANALYSIS
Update to Aivana CIO Decision Twin
Snapshot Sep 30, 2026 · 23:16 UTC · version 0.1.1
Collection source: not recorded for this historical snapshot.
First saved snapshot
No earlier snapshot is available to establish a change.
Compare saved observations
Download comparison JSONFull technical diff · 0 changed fields
Full snapshot data
{
"name": "cio-shadow-agenda",
"description": "Build the real executive agenda from weak signals, decision debt, truth gaps, value risk and escalation pressure. Use when the user needs cio shadow agenda for CIO decision support.",
"included_files": [
{
"relative_path": "agents/openai.yaml",
"size_in_bytes": 133
}
],
"skill_md_contents": "---\nname: cio-shadow-agenda\ndescription: Build the real executive agenda from weak signals, decision debt, truth gaps, value risk and escalation pressure. Use when the user needs cio shadow agenda for CIO decision support.\n---\n\n# CIO Shadow Agenda\n\n## Mission\n\nCreate the agenda the CIO should actually run, even when official reporting hides the real priorities.\n\n## Inputs\n\nAccept status packs, portfolio updates, risk registers, budget notes, incidents, audit gaps, meeting notes and executive concerns.\n\n## Workflow\n\n1. Rank topics by decision pressure, value at risk, customer impact, control exposure and attention scarcity.\n2. Separate official agenda items from hidden agenda items.\n3. Assign posture: ignore, monitor, delegate, decide, escalate or act now.\n4. Create executive talking points and first actions.\n5. Identify which topics should enter the next steering or board pack.\n\n## Output Format\n\n- Executive Summary\n- Shadow Agenda\n- Official vs Real Priority Gap\n- Attention Allocation\n- Talking Points\n- First Actions\n- Evidence & Assumptions\n\n## Guardrails\n\nBe direct but evidence-aware. Do not infer political motive without signals.\n"
}SHA-256: 67309005d4de71af0b9fb3a31752f6919be1d0c42c05aaba1028610cc9b13349