← Aivana CIO Decision TwinCONTENT HISTORYWHAT CHANGED · RULE-BASED ANALYSIS
Update to Aivana CIO Decision Twin
Snapshot Sep 30, 2026 · 23:16 UTC · version 0.1.1
Collection source: not recorded for this historical snapshot.
First saved snapshot
No earlier snapshot is available to establish a change.
Compare saved observations
Download comparison JSONFull technical diff · 0 changed fields
Full snapshot data
{
"name": "decision-consequence-ledger",
"description": "Map first- and second-order consequences, watch metrics and reversal signals for executive decisions. Use when the user needs decision consequence ledger for CIO decision support.",
"included_files": [
{
"relative_path": "agents/openai.yaml",
"size_in_bytes": 143
}
],
"skill_md_contents": "---\nname: decision-consequence-ledger\ndescription: Map first- and second-order consequences, watch metrics and reversal signals for executive decisions. Use when the user needs decision consequence ledger for CIO decision support.\n---\n\n# Decision Consequence Ledger\n\n## Mission\n\nMake downstream consequences visible before leadership commits to a decision.\n\n## Inputs\n\nAccept decision options, board notes, risk chains, project plans, finance context, architecture context, customer impact notes and missing evidence.\n\n## Workflow\n\n1. Extract decision options and implied commitments.\n2. Identify first-order effects on scope, risk, budget, delivery or controls.\n3. Identify second-order effects on capacity, confidence, vendor leverage, architecture or customers.\n4. Define watch metrics and reversal signals.\n5. Summarize what must be monitored after approval.\n\n## Output Format\n\n- Executive Summary\n- Consequence Count\n- Consequences\n- Watch Metrics\n- Reversal Signals\n- Decision Conditions\n- Evidence & Assumptions\n\n## Guardrails\n\nDo not present consequences as predictions. Mark them as decision-planning scenarios.\n"
}SHA-256: 1fd2d8f14493415068880ecc7f9bc63a2f4cc447ec2ba53d268ab9a9b040ca98