Update to Argovance Skill OS

{
  "description": "Create or audit a reusable expert-role blueprint or role prompt with responsibilities, decision rights, conflicts, handoffs, and quality criteria. Use when the deliverable itself is a role team, department simulation, AI persona configuration, or repair of a prompt containing vague or overlapping roles. Do not use for live multi-phase project orchestration, where expert roles must be routed dynamically by task.",
  "included_files": [
    {
      "relative_path": "agents/openai.yaml",
      "size_in_bytes": 227
    },
    {
      "relative_path": "references/role-tests.md",
      "size_in_bytes": 1250
    }
  ],
  "name": "compose-role-teams",
  "skill_md_contents": "---\nname: compose-role-teams\ndescription: Create or audit a reusable expert-role blueprint or role prompt with responsibilities, decision rights, conflicts, handoffs, and quality criteria. Use when the deliverable itself is a role team, department simulation, AI persona configuration, or repair of a prompt containing vague or overlapping roles. Do not use for live multi-phase project orchestration, where expert roles must be routed dynamically by task.\n---\n\n# Compose Role Teams\n\nTurn an objective into a functional team, not a theatrical list of titles.\n\n## Workflow\n\n1. Extract the objective, deliverable, domain, audience, risk, research need, execution stages, and final decision owner.\n2. List required capabilities before naming roles.\n3. Group related capabilities. Create a role only when it owns a distinct decision, artifact, evidence source, or quality gate.\n4. Default to three to five roles: lead, domain specialist, researcher/analyst when evidence matters, executor/designer, and critic/compliance reviewer when risk warrants it.\n5. Define for each role: mission, inputs, outputs, authority, prohibitions, success criteria, and handoff.\n6. Define disagreement priority. The lead integrates; safety, law, verified evidence, and explicit user constraints outrank style or optimization.\n7. Run the tests in `references/role-tests.md`. Merge redundant roles and add missing ownership.\n8. Deliver either a role blueprint, a copy-ready role prompt, or an audit of an existing role list.\n\n## Rules\n\n- Prefer responsibilities over claims such as “world-class expert.”\n- Never imply professional licensure. Require qualified human review in regulated or high-stakes contexts.\n- Do not create a role solely to repeat another role's review.\n- Keep research, creation, approval, and criticism separate only when that separation improves reliability.\n- Avoid role-play that obscures uncertainty or source limitations.\n- Preserve explicit exclusions and tool/permission boundaries.\n- Apply the shared [expert standard](../../shared/expert-system/expert-standard.md), [role registry](../../shared/expert-system/expert-role-registry.md), and [decision-authority model](../../shared/expert-system/decision-authority-model.md) when they fit the requested blueprint.\n- Route live project, phase, and task expert selection to `$orchestrate-projects`; this skill produces the reusable team contract and does not manage project execution.\n\n## Output\n\nReturn:\n\n1. Objective and assumptions\n2. Capability map\n3. Role table: role, ownership, inputs, output, authority, handoff\n4. Conflict and escalation rules\n5. Copy-ready team instruction when requested\n6. Lean-team check: roles merged, omitted, or conditional\n\nRead `references/role-tests.md` when building or auditing a team.\n"
}