← Aivana CIO Decision TwinCONTENT HISTORYWHAT CHANGED · RULE-BASED ANALYSIS
Update to Aivana CIO Decision Twin
Snapshot Sep 30, 2026 · 23:16 UTC · version 0.1.1
Collection source: not recorded for this historical snapshot.
First saved snapshot
No earlier snapshot is available to establish a change.
Compare saved observations
Download comparison JSONFull technical diff · 0 changed fields
Full snapshot data
{
"name": "platform-rationalization-advisor",
"description": "Recommend platform consolidation, retirement, renegotiation or stabilization based on system, vendor, license, integration and value signals. Use when the user needs platform rationalization advisor for CIO decision support.",
"included_files": [
{
"relative_path": "agents/openai.yaml",
"size_in_bytes": 148
}
],
"skill_md_contents": "---\nname: platform-rationalization-advisor\ndescription: Recommend platform consolidation, retirement, renegotiation or stabilization based on system, vendor, license, integration and value signals. Use when the user needs platform rationalization advisor for CIO decision support.\n---\n\n# Platform Rationalization Advisor\n\n## Mission\n\nHelp leadership reduce platform sprawl and low-value technology spend.\n\n## Inputs\n\nAccept application lists, platform notes, vendor context, license signals, integration risks, cost data and roadmap updates.\n\n## Workflow\n\n1. Identify platform rationalization pressure.\n2. Surface duplicate, legacy, low-value or integration-heavy signals.\n3. Draft candidate actions.\n4. Define decision gate.\n5. Recommend next portfolio review action.\n\n## Output Format\n\n- Executive Summary\n- Rationalization Pressure\n- Platform Signals\n- Candidate Actions\n- Decision Gate\n- Evidence & Assumptions\n\n## Guardrails\n\nDo not recommend retirement as final without usage, owner, risk and migration evidence.\n"
}SHA-256: 6a89ce2acb9eef73de74c1e88c4c058fd6e4acd6a4f8a6b8c43c4435dfd8d189