← Research AssistantCONTENT HISTORYWHAT CHANGED · RULE-BASED ANALYSIS
Update to Research Assistant
Snapshot Sep 30, 2026 · 23:17 UTC · version 0.1.0
Collection source: not recorded for this historical snapshot.
First saved snapshot
No earlier snapshot is available to establish a change.
Compare saved observations
Download comparison JSONFull technical diff · 0 changed fields
Full snapshot data
{
"description": "Find, evaluate, compare, and synthesize academic papers and scholarly evidence.",
"included_files": [],
"name": "academic-research",
"skill_md_contents": "---\nname: academic-research\ndescription: Find, evaluate, compare, and synthesize academic papers and scholarly evidence.\n---\n\n# Academic Research\n\nUse for literature reviews, paper discovery, methodology comparison, citation support, and research-gap analysis.\n\n## Method\n\n1. Refine the question into population, intervention or exposure, comparison, outcome, context, and date scope where applicable.\n2. Define inclusion and exclusion criteria before collecting sources for a review.\n3. Prefer original peer-reviewed research, systematic reviews, official datasets, and clearly labeled preprints.\n4. Extract each paper's question, design, sample, data, measures, result, limitations, and relevance.\n5. Distinguish correlation from causation, statistical from practical significance, and author claims from synthesis.\n6. Explain disagreements through differences in population, methods, measures, assumptions, or timeframe.\n7. Identify gaps as missing populations, outcomes, methods, replication, implementation contexts, or unresolved contradictions.\n\nNever fabricate authors, dates, journals, DOIs, quotations, sample sizes, or effect sizes. Label preprints and secondary summaries accurately.\n"
}SHA-256 of public snapshot: bd2bc1af7cc1cc784d3a0b02b631669de512a50a4296aea1ced1e05b7d7c4828