Update to Matt Pocock Skills

{
  "description": "Use when the user wants to sanity-check whether a state model or logic feels right, or explore what a UI should look like.",
  "included_files": [
    {
      "relative_path": "LOGIC.md",
      "size_in_bytes": 6093
    },
    {
      "relative_path": "UI.md",
      "size_in_bytes": 6959
    },
    {
      "relative_path": "agents/openai.yaml",
      "size_in_bytes": 216
    }
  ],
  "name": "prototype",
  "skill_md_contents": "---\nname: prototype\ndescription: Use when the user wants to sanity-check whether a state model or logic feels right, or explore what a UI should\n  look like.\n---\n\n# Prototype\n\nA prototype is **throwaway code that answers a question**. The question decides the shape.\n\n## Pick a branch\n\nIdentify which question is being answered — from the user's prompt, the surrounding code, or by asking if the user is around:\n\n- **\"Does this logic / state model feel right?\"** → [LOGIC.md](LOGIC.md). Build a single shareable HTML file — free-play buttons plus tabbed guided walkthroughs — that pushes the state machine through cases that are hard to reason about on paper, and that a non-developer can drive.\n- **\"What should this look like?\"** → [UI.md](UI.md). Generate several radically different UI variations on a single route, switchable via a URL search param and a floating bottom bar.\n\nThe two branches produce very different artifacts — getting this wrong wastes the whole prototype. If the question is genuinely ambiguous and the user isn't reachable, default to whichever branch better matches the surrounding code (a backend module → logic; a page or component → UI) and state the assumption at the top of the prototype.\n\n## Rules that apply to both\n\n1. **Throwaway from day one, and clearly marked as such.** Locate the prototype code close to where it will actually be used (next to the module or page it's prototyping for) so context is obvious — but name it so a casual reader can see it's a prototype, not production. For throwaway UI routes, obey whatever routing convention the project already uses; don't invent a new top-level structure.\n2. **Trivial to run.** A UI prototype starts from one command in the project's task runner — `pnpm <name>`, `python <path>`, `bun <path>`, etc. A logic demo is a single HTML file the user double-clicks. Either way, no thinking required to start it.\n3. **No persistence by default.** State lives in memory. Persistence is the thing the prototype is _checking_, not something it should depend on. If the question explicitly involves a database, hit a scratch DB or a local file with a clear \"PROTOTYPE — wipe me\" name.\n4. **Skip the polish.** No tests, no error handling beyond what makes the prototype _runnable_, no abstractions. The point is to learn something fast.\n5. **Surface the state.** After every action (logic) or on every variant switch (UI), print or render the full relevant state so the user can see what changed.\n6. **Capture it when done.** Fold any validated decision into the real code, then capture the prototype itself as a **primary source**: commit it to a throwaway branch, out of main, and leave a context pointer to that branch on the implementation issue. Capture the answer too — the verdict and the question it settled — in the issue or a commit. The main branch keeps only the validated decision.\n"
}