← DXD SkillsCONTENT HISTORYWHAT CHANGED · RULE-BASED ANALYSIS
Update to DXD Skills
Snapshot Sep 30, 2026 · 23:18 UTC · version 0.3.0
Collection source: not recorded for this historical snapshot.
First saved snapshot
No earlier snapshot is available to establish a change.
Compare saved observations
Download comparison JSONFull technical diff · 0 changed fields
Full snapshot data
{
"name": "anti-slop",
"description": "Edit prose for specific AI-writing tells while preserving the author's voice. Use when a user asks to make a draft sound less AI-generated, remove slop, or perform an editorial pass focused on formulaic phrasing.",
"included_files": [
{
"relative_path": "references/tells.md",
"size_in_bytes": 3619
}
],
"skill_md_contents": "---\nname: anti-slop\ndescription: >-\n Edit prose for specific AI-writing tells while preserving the author's voice.\n Use when a user asks to make a draft sound less AI-generated, remove slop, or\n perform an editorial pass focused on formulaic phrasing.\n---\n\n# Anti-Slop\n\n## Goal\n\nRemove formulaic filler, vague puffery, and repeated rhetorical patterns without\nchanging the author's meaning, register, or intentional style.\n\n## When to Use\n\nUse this for a requested anti-slop or voice-preserving editorial pass. Do not\nload it for ordinary drafting or a general proofreading request unless the user\nidentifies AI-sounding prose as the problem.\n\n## Workflow\n\n1. Read the whole piece and identify its voice, audience, and argument.\n2. Mark candidates that add little meaning or repeat a recognizable formula.\n Common candidates include meta introductions, unearned importance claims,\n vague conclusions, inflated predictions, and decorative metaphors.\n3. Keep candidates that serve a deliberate rhetorical purpose. When uncertain,\n preserve the original.\n4. Make the smallest phrasing edits that improve clarity or specificity. Keep\n facts, structure, and the author's position unchanged unless asked.\n5. Re-read edited passages for rhythm and report material edits when reviewing.\n\nFor a contested edit or a broader catalog of tells, read\n[references/tells.md](references/tells.md).\n\n## Guardrails\n\n- Never change facts, names, citations, technical claims, or argument during a\n phrasing pass.\n- Never treat particular words, punctuation, fragments, parallelism, or\n rhetorical devices as automatically wrong. Judge their effect in context.\n- Preserve intentional cadence, humor, conviction, and register.\n- Stop when further edits would be taste rather than a clear improvement.\n\n## Completion Checklist\n\n- [ ] The author's voice and intent were understood before edits.\n- [ ] Each edit removes a concrete tell or improves specificity.\n- [ ] Meaning and factual content remain intact.\n- [ ] The revised passages still sound intentional when read aloud.\n\n## Attribution\n\nAdapted from [`elithrar/dotfiles` anti-slop](https://github.com/elithrar/dotfiles/blob/main/.agents/skills/anti-slop/SKILL.md), created by Matt Silverlock and licensed under the MIT License.\n"
}SHA-256: 19c7a82b3c87ab012e409b81cdaf780d1507cacd94bbe7501f169879ef27b53a