← Arclight Feasibility PlannerCONTENT HISTORY

Update to Arclight Feasibility Planner

Snapshot Oct 8, 2026 · 18:03 UTC · version 1.0.0

Collection source: downloaded plugin package.

WHAT CHANGED · RULE-BASED ANALYSIS

First saved snapshot

No earlier snapshot is available to establish a change.

Compare saved observations

Download comparison JSON
Full technical diff · 0 changed fields
Full snapshot data
{
  "description": "Scope a U.S. healthcare service feasibility study or practice expansion, establish its assumptions, and coordinate demand, payment, operations, financial, and pilot planning. Use for a full feasibility request or an unclear service concept.",
  "included_files": [
    {
      "relative_path": "agents/openai.yaml",
      "size_in_bytes": 224
    }
  ],
  "name": "define-healthcare-service",
  "skill_md_contents": "---\nname: define-healthcare-service\ndescription: Scope a U.S. healthcare service feasibility study or practice expansion, establish its assumptions, and coordinate demand, payment, operations, financial, and pilot planning. Use for a full feasibility request or an unclear service concept.\n---\n\n# Define a healthcare service\n\nRead [working rules](../../references/working-rules.md). Use the information already supplied before asking questions.\n\nEstablish the decision, service, geography, delivery setting, clinician roles, payer scope, planning year, existing-practice versus standalone context, and investment or access objectives. Ask the most consequential missing questions together. Do useful preliminary work while uncertain inputs remain clearly marked.\n\nCreate a one-page service definition and [assumption register](../../assets/assumption-register.csv). Define annual unique patients, episodes, visits, and active census separately. Identify resources already available and what capacity they can absorb. Separate a clinic's economics from those of an outside implementation/service company. A public-health access objective may require an explicit subsidy scenario rather than an assumed profit objective.\n\nFor a full study, follow the applicable workflow references in order; do not require the user to invoke six skills individually:\n\n1. [Assess demand](../assess-healthcare-demand/SKILL.md): demographics, alternatives, referral access, reachable activity.\n2. [Plan payment assumptions](../plan-healthcare-payment/SKILL.md): official-resource guidance and amount provenance.\n3. [Design operations](../design-healthcare-operations/SKILL.md): capacity, service patterns, labor, equipment, routes/rooms.\n4. [Model finances](../model-healthcare-finances/SKILL.md): unit economics, constrained activity, cash and scenarios.\n5. [Decide and pilot](../plan-healthcare-pilot/SKILL.md): recommendation, validation priorities, implementation conditions.\n\nRead only the references needed for a narrower request. When mobile wound care is the user's service, consult the [worked example](../../references/mobile-care-example.md) for method, never as local market or clinical evidence. Write the executive recommendation after the analysis using the [decision brief](../../assets/decision-brief.md). Deliver preliminary findings even if a missing input prevents a final recommendation, and state which input would change the decision.\n"
}

SHA-256 of public snapshot: 8e6436702494ad93fd4fde29d3ba6c3e2226455926f5c10bcf2793ddc3780a9f