← Creative ClawCONTENT HISTORY

Update to Creative Claw

Snapshot Oct 24, 2026 · 12:48 UTC · version 5.4.2

Collection source: downloaded plugin package.

WHAT CHANGED

Instructions updated for creativeclaw-submit-feedback

Full description — Now says: Send actionable product and quality feedback to the Creative Claw team when the user gives feedback or a concrete issue comes up; not for refund requests or...

Observed in instructions or declared skills. Runtime behavior has not been tested.

Save Creative Claw and check future changes in Following.

Up to 10 plugins free · no card required.

All fields and original values.

Full description

Before

Oct 3, 2026 · 06:03 UTC

Send user-approved feedback to the Creative Claw team. Use when the user asks to send feedback or approves an offer to report; not for refunds or fixing media.

After

Oct 24, 2026 · 12:48 UTC

Send actionable product and quality feedback to the Creative Claw team when the user gives feedback or a concrete issue comes up; not for refund requests or fixing media.

Skill instructions

Before

Oct 3, 2026 · 06:03 UTC

user-approved feedback to the Creative Claw team. Use when the user asks to send feedback or approves an offer to report; not for refunds or fixing media." Send a report only when the user asks or approves. Topics: - An image, video, or ...

After

Oct 24, 2026 · 12:48 UTC

actionable product and quality feedback to the Creative Claw team when the user gives feedback or a concrete issue comes up; not for refund requests or fixing media." For each Creative Claw tool call that exposes it, pass the optional `s...

Supporting files

Before

Oct 3, 2026 · 06:03 UTC

[{"relative_path":"agents/openai.yaml","size_in_bytes":549},{"relative_path":"references/job-recovery.md","size_in_bytes":3786},{"relative_path":"references/media-assembly.md","size_in_bytes":8654},{"relative_path":"references/platform-u...

After

Oct 24, 2026 · 12:48 UTC

[{"relative_path":"agents/openai.yaml","size_in_bytes":548},{"relative_path":"references/job-recovery.md","size_in_bytes":3786},{"relative_path":"references/media-assembly.md","size_in_bytes":8654},{"relative_path":"references/platform-u...

Compare saved observations

Download comparison JSON

SKILL.md text changes

− removed · + added

--- before
+++ after
@@ -1,26 +1,32 @@
 ---
 name: creativeclaw-submit-feedback
-description: "Send user-approved feedback to the Creative Claw team. Use when the user asks to send feedback or approves an offer to report; not for refunds or fixing media."
+description: "Send actionable product and quality feedback to the Creative Claw team when the user gives feedback or a concrete issue comes up; not for refund requests or fixing media."
 ---
 
 # Submit Feedback
 
+For each Creative Claw tool call that exposes it, pass the optional `skills_used` array with `creativeclaw-submit-feedback`, any other Creative Claw skills actually followed, and guide entries in the form `<skill-name>/<relative-guide-path>` (for example, `creativeclaw-submit-feedback/references/workflow-basics.md`). Include only skills and guides followed for that call. Omit attribution if the user declines tracking or the field is unavailable. Never send other plugin names, private data, or local paths.
+
+**Not connected yet?** If no Creative Claw tools (such as `list_models` or `generate_image`) are available, the plugin is installed but the server is not connected. Stop and tell the user to open the plugin's Connectors tab in their app (or the MCP server list in a terminal client), connect Creative Claw, sign in, and ask again. Do not substitute other tools or describe a result that was not generated.
+
 Read [shared execution guidance](references/workflow-basics.md) once per task before using tools. It covers existing authorization, model discovery, optional cost checks, imports, and recovery.
 
 Turn the user's report into one concise, useful `submit_feedback` call. Feedback is a product-feedback channel, not a refund request form, a generation tool, or a promise of compensation, reply, or roadmap commitment.
 
+Report meaningful quality problems so the team can improve future generations. One isolated quality issue is worth reporting; repeated failure is not required. Say briefly that you reported it, and do not report when the user asks you not to.
+
 ## What can be reported
 
-Send a report only when the user asks or approves. Topics:
+Report meaningful issues you observe and feedback the user expresses. Respect a request not to report feedback. Topics:
 
 - A tool failed, returned the wrong state, or behaved inconsistently.
-- An image, video, or voice result had a repeatable quality problem.
+- An image, video, or voice result had a concrete quality problem, even on a single attempt.
 - A workflow or instruction was confusing.
 - A completed image, video, or voice result missed creative expectations without a confirmed technical malfunction.
 - The user asks for a missing feature, integration, format, or model.
-- The user explicitly asks to send praise or product feedback.
+- The user expresses praise or product feedback.
 
-Do not treat subjective dissatisfaction as a technical bug, submit a refund request through this channel, silently report generation failures, or use this skill when the user only wants help revising media. If a completed, playable video is simply disappointing, it may be reported as `generation_quality`, but that does not imply refund eligibility. If you observed the issue rather than receiving an explicit request, offer to report it and wait for approval.
+Do not treat subjective dissatisfaction as a technical bug or submit a refund request through this channel. Reporting feedback should not interrupt helping the user revise their media. If a completed, playable video is simply disappointing, it may be reported as `generation_quality`, but that does not imply refund eligibility. Use source="agent" for issues you observed and source="user" for the user's own feedback.
 
 ## Charges, improvement and critical issues
 
@@ -34,6 +40,8 @@
 
 Include the user's intended outcome, what happened, expected behavior, useful reproduction details, model or tool involved, and practical impact. Exclude secrets, credentials, unnecessary personal information, and unsupported guesses.
 
+Describe the quality gap without turning it into a refund or compensation request. Do not infer refund intent or suggest asking for credits back. If the user explicitly wants a refund or compensation, direct them to [support@creativeclaw.co](mailto:support@creativeclaw.co) with the relevant job ID. Still report any concrete underlying quality issue as product feedback, without adding a refund request.
+
 Map the report to the exact schema:
 
 - `category`: `bug`, `generation_quality`, `missing_feature`, `confusing`, `praise`, or `other`
@@ -44,4 +52,4 @@
 
 ## Submit and continue
 
-After the user asks or approves, call `submit_feedback` once per distinct issue. Confirm what category was sent without promising a response. If the user still needs help, continue with a safe workaround or corrected workflow after submitting.
+Call `submit_feedback` once per distinct issue, unless the user asks you not to report it. Tell the user what category was sent without promising a response. If the user still needs help, continue with a safe workaround or corrected workflow after submitting.
Full technical diff · 3 changed fields

changed /description

BEFORE
"Send user-approved feedback to the Creative Claw team. Use when the user asks to send feedback or approves an offer to report; not for refunds or fixing media."
AFTER
"Send actionable product and quality feedback to the Creative Claw team when the user gives feedback or a concrete issue comes up; not for refund requests or fixing media."

changed /included_files

BEFORE
[
  {
    "relative_path": "agents/openai.yaml",
    "size_in_bytes": 549
  },
  {
    "relative_path": "references/job-recovery.md",
    "size_in_bytes": 3786
  },
  {
    "relative_path": "references/media-assembly.md",
    "size_in_bytes": 8654
  },
  {
    "relative_path": "references/platform-upload.md",
    "size_in_bytes": 1416
  },
  {
    "relative_path": "references/workflow-basics.md",
    "size_in_bytes": 7260
  }
]
AFTER
[
  {
    "relative_path": "agents/openai.yaml",
    "size_in_bytes": 548
  },
  {
    "relative_path": "references/job-recovery.md",
    "size_in_bytes": 3786
  },
  {
    "relative_path": "references/media-assembly.md",
    "size_in_bytes": 8654
  },
  {
    "relative_path": "references/platform-upload.md",
    "size_in_bytes": 1416
  },
  {
    "relative_path": "references/voices/speech-localization.md",
    "size_in_bytes": 3869
  },
  {
    "relative_path": "references/workflow-basics.md",
    "size_in_bytes": 10396
  }
]

changed /skill_md_contents

BEFORE
"---\nname: creativeclaw-submit-feedback\ndescription: \"Send user-approved feedback to the Creative Claw team. Use when the user asks to send feedback or approves an offer to report; not for refunds or fixing media.\"\n---\n\n# Submit Feedback\n\nRead [shared execution guidance](references/workflow-basics.md) once per task before using tools. It covers existing authorization, model discovery, optional cost checks, imports, and recovery.\n\nTurn the user's report into one concise, useful `submit_feedback` call. Feedback is a product-feedback channel, not a refund request form, a generation tool, or a promise of compensation, reply, or roadmap commitment.\n\n## What can be reported\n\nSend a report only when the user asks or approves. Topics:\n\n- A tool failed, returned the wrong state, or behaved inconsistently.\n- An image, video, or voice result had a repeatable quality problem.\n- A workflow or instruction was confusing.\n- A completed image, video, or voice result missed creative expectations without a confirmed technical malfunction.\n- The user asks for a missing feature, integration, format, or model.\n- The user explicitly asks to send praise or product feedback.\n\nDo not treat subjective dissatisfaction as a technical bug, submit a refund request through this channel, silently report generation failures, or use this skill when the user only wants help revising media. If a completed, playable video is simply disappointing, it may be reported as `generation_quality`, but that does not imply refund eligibility. If you observed the issue rather than receiving an explicit request, offer to report it and wait for approval.\n\n## Charges, improvement and critical issues\n\nGenerations that successfully produce a playable video output are charged even if the user is not fully happy with the creative result. Explain this empathetically when relevant, not as a dismissal of the problem. Sending feedback helps us improve the system for future generations; it does not itself issue a refund, reverse a charge, promise a fix or authorize another paid attempt.\n\nUse `generation_quality` for disappointing creative results without a confirmed technical malfunction. Failed, corrupted or unplayable output is a different issue; do not label it a successful generation merely because a URL exists. Use `manage_account({ section: \"activity\" })` to verify the specific job's actual charges and refunds rather than guessing from its status.\n\nFor critical issues, users can also contact [support@creativeclaw.co](mailto:support@creativeclaw.co). Suggest including the relevant job ID and a short description, without passwords, payment details or private source recordings. Do not promise a response time, refund or resolution, and do not send an email on their behalf unless requested.\n\n## Build the report\n\nInclude the user's intended outcome, what happened, expected behavior, useful reproduction details, model or tool involved, and practical impact. Exclude secrets, credentials, unnecessary personal information, and unsupported guesses.\n\nMap the report to the exact schema:\n\n- `category`: `bug`, `generation_quality`, `missing_feature`, `confusing`, `praise`, or `other`\n- `source`: `user` when explicitly requested or relayed; `agent` for an agent-observed product issue\n- `message`: the concise report\n- `attemptedTask`: the task the user was trying to complete, when relevant\n- `toolName`: the exact MCP tool involved, when known\n\n## Submit and continue\n\nAfter the user asks or approves, call `submit_feedback` once per distinct issue. Confirm what category was sent without promising a response. If the user still needs help, continue with a safe workaround or corrected workflow after submitting.\n"
AFTER
"---\nname: creativeclaw-submit-feedback\ndescription: \"Send actionable product and quality feedback to the Creative Claw team when the user gives feedback or a concrete issue comes up; not for refund requests or fixing media.\"\n---\n\n# Submit Feedback\n\nFor each Creative Claw tool call that exposes it, pass the optional `skills_used` array with `creativeclaw-submit-feedback`, any other Creative Claw skills actually followed, and guide entries in the form `<skill-name>/<relative-guide-path>` (for example, `creativeclaw-submit-feedback/references/workflow-basics.md`). Include only skills and guides followed for that call. Omit attribution if the user declines tracking or the field is unavailable. Never send other plugin names, private data, or local paths.\n\n**Not connected yet?** If no Creative Claw tools (such as `list_models` or `generate_image`) are available, the plugin is installed but the server is not connected. Stop and tell the user to open the plugin's Connectors tab in their app (or the MCP server list in a terminal client), connect Creative Claw, sign in, and ask again. Do not substitute other tools or describe a result that was not generated.\n\nRead [shared execution guidance](references/workflow-basics.md) once per task before using tools. It covers existing authorization, model discovery, optional cost checks, imports, and recovery.\n\nTurn the user's report into one concise, useful `submit_feedback` call. Feedback is a product-feedback channel, not a refund request form, a generation tool, or a promise of compensation, reply, or roadmap commitment.\n\nReport meaningful quality problems so the team can improve future generations. One isolated quality issue is worth reporting; repeated failure is not required. Say briefly that you reported it, and do not report when the user asks you not to.\n\n## What can be reported\n\nReport meaningful issues you observe and feedback the user expresses. Respect a request not to report feedback. Topics:\n\n- A tool failed, returned the wrong state, or behaved inconsistently.\n- An image, video, or voice result had a concrete quality problem, even on a single attempt.\n- A workflow or instruction was confusing.\n- A completed image, video, or voice result missed creative expectations without a confirmed technical malfunction.\n- The user asks for a missing feature, integration, format, or model.\n- The user expresses praise or product feedback.\n\nDo not treat subjective dissatisfaction as a technical bug or submit a refund request through this channel. Reporting feedback should not interrupt helping the user revise their media. If a completed, playable video is simply disappointing, it may be reported as `generation_quality`, but that does not imply refund eligibility. Use source=\"agent\" for issues you observed and source=\"user\" for the user's own feedback.\n\n## Charges, improvement and critical issues\n\nGenerations that successfully produce a playable video output are charged even if the user is not fully happy with the creative result. Explain this empathetically when relevant, not as a dismissal of the problem. Sending feedback helps us improve the system for future generations; it does not itself issue a refund, reverse a charge, promise a fix or authorize another paid attempt.\n\nUse `generation_quality` for disappointing creative results without a confirmed technical malfunction. Failed, corrupted or unplayable output is a different issue; do not label it a successful generation merely because a URL exists. Use `manage_account({ section: \"activity\" })` to verify the specific job's actual charges and refunds rather than guessing from its status.\n\nFor critical issues, users can also contact [support@creativeclaw.co](mailto:support@creativeclaw.co). Suggest including the relevant job ID and a short description, without passwords, payment details or private source recordings. Do not promise a response time, refund or resolution, and do not send an email on their behalf unless requested.\n\n## Build the report\n\nInclude the user's intended outcome, what happened, expected behavior, useful reproduction details, model or tool involved, and practical impact. Exclude secrets, credentials, unnecessary personal information, and unsupported guesses.\n\nDescribe the quality gap without turning it into a refund or compensation request. Do not infer refund intent or suggest asking for credits back. If the user explicitly wants a refund or compensation, direct them to [support@creativeclaw.co](mailto:support@creativeclaw.co) with the relevant job ID. Still report any concrete underlying quality issue as product feedback, without adding a refund request.\n\nMap the report to the exact schema:\n\n- `category`: `bug`, `generation_quality`, `missing_feature`, `confusing`, `praise`, or `other`\n- `source`: `user` when explicitly requested or relayed; `agent` for an agent-observed product issue\n- `message`: the concise report\n- `attemptedTask`: the task the user was trying to complete, when relevant\n- `toolName`: the exact MCP tool involved, when known\n\n## Submit and continue\n\nCall `submit_feedback` once per distinct issue, unless the user asks you not to report it. Tell the user what category was sent without promising a response. If the user still needs help, continue with a safe workaround or corrected workflow after submitting.\n"
Full snapshot data
{
  "description": "Send actionable product and quality feedback to the Creative Claw team when the user gives feedback or a concrete issue comes up; not for refund requests or fixing media.",
  "included_files": [
    {
      "relative_path": "agents/openai.yaml",
      "size_in_bytes": 548
    },
    {
      "relative_path": "references/job-recovery.md",
      "size_in_bytes": 3786
    },
    {
      "relative_path": "references/media-assembly.md",
      "size_in_bytes": 8654
    },
    {
      "relative_path": "references/platform-upload.md",
      "size_in_bytes": 1416
    },
    {
      "relative_path": "references/voices/speech-localization.md",
      "size_in_bytes": 3869
    },
    {
      "relative_path": "references/workflow-basics.md",
      "size_in_bytes": 10396
    }
  ],
  "name": "creativeclaw-submit-feedback",
  "skill_md_contents": "---\nname: creativeclaw-submit-feedback\ndescription: \"Send actionable product and quality feedback to the Creative Claw team when the user gives feedback or a concrete issue comes up; not for refund requests or fixing media.\"\n---\n\n# Submit Feedback\n\nFor each Creative Claw tool call that exposes it, pass the optional `skills_used` array with `creativeclaw-submit-feedback`, any other Creative Claw skills actually followed, and guide entries in the form `<skill-name>/<relative-guide-path>` (for example, `creativeclaw-submit-feedback/references/workflow-basics.md`). Include only skills and guides followed for that call. Omit attribution if the user declines tracking or the field is unavailable. Never send other plugin names, private data, or local paths.\n\n**Not connected yet?** If no Creative Claw tools (such as `list_models` or `generate_image`) are available, the plugin is installed but the server is not connected. Stop and tell the user to open the plugin's Connectors tab in their app (or the MCP server list in a terminal client), connect Creative Claw, sign in, and ask again. Do not substitute other tools or describe a result that was not generated.\n\nRead [shared execution guidance](references/workflow-basics.md) once per task before using tools. It covers existing authorization, model discovery, optional cost checks, imports, and recovery.\n\nTurn the user's report into one concise, useful `submit_feedback` call. Feedback is a product-feedback channel, not a refund request form, a generation tool, or a promise of compensation, reply, or roadmap commitment.\n\nReport meaningful quality problems so the team can improve future generations. One isolated quality issue is worth reporting; repeated failure is not required. Say briefly that you reported it, and do not report when the user asks you not to.\n\n## What can be reported\n\nReport meaningful issues you observe and feedback the user expresses. Respect a request not to report feedback. Topics:\n\n- A tool failed, returned the wrong state, or behaved inconsistently.\n- An image, video, or voice result had a concrete quality problem, even on a single attempt.\n- A workflow or instruction was confusing.\n- A completed image, video, or voice result missed creative expectations without a confirmed technical malfunction.\n- The user asks for a missing feature, integration, format, or model.\n- The user expresses praise or product feedback.\n\nDo not treat subjective dissatisfaction as a technical bug or submit a refund request through this channel. Reporting feedback should not interrupt helping the user revise their media. If a completed, playable video is simply disappointing, it may be reported as `generation_quality`, but that does not imply refund eligibility. Use source=\"agent\" for issues you observed and source=\"user\" for the user's own feedback.\n\n## Charges, improvement and critical issues\n\nGenerations that successfully produce a playable video output are charged even if the user is not fully happy with the creative result. Explain this empathetically when relevant, not as a dismissal of the problem. Sending feedback helps us improve the system for future generations; it does not itself issue a refund, reverse a charge, promise a fix or authorize another paid attempt.\n\nUse `generation_quality` for disappointing creative results without a confirmed technical malfunction. Failed, corrupted or unplayable output is a different issue; do not label it a successful generation merely because a URL exists. Use `manage_account({ section: \"activity\" })` to verify the specific job's actual charges and refunds rather than guessing from its status.\n\nFor critical issues, users can also contact [support@creativeclaw.co](mailto:support@creativeclaw.co). Suggest including the relevant job ID and a short description, without passwords, payment details or private source recordings. Do not promise a response time, refund or resolution, and do not send an email on their behalf unless requested.\n\n## Build the report\n\nInclude the user's intended outcome, what happened, expected behavior, useful reproduction details, model or tool involved, and practical impact. Exclude secrets, credentials, unnecessary personal information, and unsupported guesses.\n\nDescribe the quality gap without turning it into a refund or compensation request. Do not infer refund intent or suggest asking for credits back. If the user explicitly wants a refund or compensation, direct them to [support@creativeclaw.co](mailto:support@creativeclaw.co) with the relevant job ID. Still report any concrete underlying quality issue as product feedback, without adding a refund request.\n\nMap the report to the exact schema:\n\n- `category`: `bug`, `generation_quality`, `missing_feature`, `confusing`, `praise`, or `other`\n- `source`: `user` when explicitly requested or relayed; `agent` for an agent-observed product issue\n- `message`: the concise report\n- `attemptedTask`: the task the user was trying to complete, when relevant\n- `toolName`: the exact MCP tool involved, when known\n\n## Submit and continue\n\nCall `submit_feedback` once per distinct issue, unless the user asks you not to report it. Tell the user what category was sent without promising a response. If the user still needs help, continue with a safe workaround or corrected workflow after submitting.\n"
}

SHA-256 of public snapshot: d29f015dc5224b62082983fbde0cefa5a9776d9f3f5379f88abfc88b3a7b9068