Update to Agiflow
Snapshot Oct 24, 2026 · 12:56 UTC · version 3.0.1
Collection source: downloaded plugin package. These snapshots do not have a confirmed matching collection source. Differences in file lists alone do not establish changes to the package.
Instructions updated for daily-standup
Skill instructions — Now says: Daily Standup Give a brief, read-only account of what needs attention, what is in progress, and the next useful action. Agiflow is the shared work record;...
Observed in instructions or declared skills. Runtime behavior has not been tested.
Up to 10 plugins free · no card required.
All fields and original values.
Skill instructions
Sep 30, 2026 · 22:51 UTC
Agiflow Daily Standup Give a brief, evidence-based project pulse. Do not modify workspace data. ## Workflow 1. Call `get_current_scope` and resolve the requested project when needed. 2. Call `list_active_tasks_by_org` for current active ...
Oct 24, 2026 · 12:56 UTC
Daily Standup Give a brief, read-only account of what needs attention, what is in progress, and the next useful action. Agiflow is the shared work record; this skill reports on it and does not change it. - Read only. Do not create commen...
Compare saved observations
Download comparison JSONSKILL.md text changes
− removed · + added
--- before +++ after @@ -3,38 +3,41 @@ description: Produce a concise read-only Agiflow status summary covering completed work, work in progress, blockers, and recommended next priorities. Use for daily standups, morning checks, stakeholder updates, or a quick project pulse. --- -# Agiflow Daily Standup +# Daily Standup -Give a brief, evidence-based project pulse. Do not modify workspace data. +Give a brief, read-only account of what needs attention, what is in progress, and the next useful action. Agiflow is the shared work record; this skill reports on it and does not change it. -## Workflow +## Guardrails -1. Call `get_current_scope` and resolve the requested project when needed. -2. Call `list_active_tasks_by_org` for current active work. -3. Call `list_work_units` for active and blocked work units. -4. Call `get_project_detail` when the summary is project-specific. -5. Call `list_members` to resolve assignee context. -6. Call `get_task`, `get_work_unit_progress`, or `list_task_comments` only when needed to confirm progress or a blocker. -7. Summarize: - - Done or moved to Review since the latest available update - - Current work in progress - - Blocked or stalled items - - Highest-priority next actions - -## Priority Logic - -1. Resolve blockers that prevent other work. -2. Finish existing work in progress before starting more work. -3. Select the highest-priority ready item. -4. Recommend refinement when a task is not ready. +- Read only. Do not create comments, change statuses, reassign tasks, or delete anything during a standup. +- Label the scope (organization or project) and the snapshot time. Keep the user's reporting window when one is given. Never claim "since last check" without a known earlier boundary. +- A task's `updatedAt` is not its completion time or blocked-since time. Do not infer history from current status or a recent edit. +- A review status or a checked acceptance criterion is not proof of completion. Report evidence states as returned. +- A failed read is not an empty result. Say which reads failed or which pages were not loaded. Never say "all clear" when data is missing. -## Output Format +## Gather the snapshot -Use short sections titled Done, In Progress, Blocked, and Next Up. Include task or work-unit identifiers when available. State clearly when no recent changes or blockers are found. +1. Resolve scope. If the user names a project, find it with `list_projects`. Otherwise use the current organization; `get_current_scope` confirms what the connection is bound to. +2. Call `list_tasks` with `view: "attention"` (and the project when one is resolved) for the shared prioritized queue. Keep the returned ordering; do not invent a separate urgency score. Use `total` for counts, not the visible page length, and continue with `nextOffset` when needed. +3. Read current work: `list_tasks` with `statusFilter: "active"` for a project, or `list_active_tasks_by_org` for an organization. +4. For the few most important items, call `get_task` with `view: "handoff"`. Attribute comments to their author and time instead of treating them as verified facts. +5. Use `get_organization_summary` or `get_work_unit_progress` only when a count or progress figure is needed to explain an item. -## Guardrails +## Describe what the evidence supports + +- For attention items, state the returned reason: blocked, in review, overdue, reported, rejected, or stale. +- Evidence states: `reported` means a result exists without approval; `verified` means approved evidence is current; `stale` means the task or criteria changed after the result. +- If the user asks for a historical report (for example "what finished this week") and dated history is not available, give a clearly labeled current snapshot and say the requested change count is unavailable. Do not invent baselines, completion counts, or delivery dates. + +## Present the standup + +Keep it short: + +- **Scope and time**: organization or project name, snapshot time. +- **Needs attention**: the most important items with task identifiers, reasons, and dashboard links when returned. +- **In progress**: current work grouped by project or work unit. +- **Suggested next actions**: one or two, marked as recommendations. + +Separate recorded facts from recommendations. A recommendation does not authorize a change; if the user wants to act on one, switch to the matching workflow (for example `triage` or `refine-task`). -- Remain read-only. Do not call mutation tools. -- Do not claim an item changed recently unless the returned data supports that conclusion. -- Distinguish confirmed blockers from possible signs of stalled work. -- Keep the summary scannable and end with one clear recommendation. +When the attention queue read succeeded and is empty, say no tasks match the attention rules in this scope. Do not equate that with all project work being complete.
Full technical diff · 1 changed fields
changed /skill_md_contents
"---\nname: daily-standup\ndescription: Produce a concise read-only Agiflow status summary covering completed work, work in progress, blockers, and recommended next priorities. Use for daily standups, morning checks, stakeholder updates, or a quick project pulse.\n---\n\n# Agiflow Daily Standup\n\nGive a brief, evidence-based project pulse. Do not modify workspace data.\n\n## Workflow\n\n1. Call `get_current_scope` and resolve the requested project when needed.\n2. Call `list_active_tasks_by_org` for current active work.\n3. Call `list_work_units` for active and blocked work units.\n4. Call `get_project_detail` when the summary is project-specific.\n5. Call `list_members` to resolve assignee context.\n6. Call `get_task`, `get_work_unit_progress`, or `list_task_comments` only when needed to confirm progress or a blocker.\n7. Summarize:\n - Done or moved to Review since the latest available update\n - Current work in progress\n - Blocked or stalled items\n - Highest-priority next actions\n\n## Priority Logic\n\n1. Resolve blockers that prevent other work.\n2. Finish existing work in progress before starting more work.\n3. Select the highest-priority ready item.\n4. Recommend refinement when a task is not ready.\n\n## Output Format\n\nUse short sections titled Done, In Progress, Blocked, and Next Up. Include task or work-unit identifiers when available. State clearly when no recent changes or blockers are found.\n\n## Guardrails\n\n- Remain read-only. Do not call mutation tools.\n- Do not claim an item changed recently unless the returned data supports that conclusion.\n- Distinguish confirmed blockers from possible signs of stalled work.\n- Keep the summary scannable and end with one clear recommendation.\n"
"---\nname: daily-standup\ndescription: Produce a concise read-only Agiflow status summary covering completed work, work in progress, blockers, and recommended next priorities. Use for daily standups, morning checks, stakeholder updates, or a quick project pulse.\n---\n\n# Daily Standup\n\nGive a brief, read-only account of what needs attention, what is in progress, and the next useful action. Agiflow is the shared work record; this skill reports on it and does not change it.\n\n## Guardrails\n\n- Read only. Do not create comments, change statuses, reassign tasks, or delete anything during a standup.\n- Label the scope (organization or project) and the snapshot time. Keep the user's reporting window when one is given. Never claim \"since last check\" without a known earlier boundary.\n- A task's `updatedAt` is not its completion time or blocked-since time. Do not infer history from current status or a recent edit.\n- A review status or a checked acceptance criterion is not proof of completion. Report evidence states as returned.\n- A failed read is not an empty result. Say which reads failed or which pages were not loaded. Never say \"all clear\" when data is missing.\n\n## Gather the snapshot\n\n1. Resolve scope. If the user names a project, find it with `list_projects`. Otherwise use the current organization; `get_current_scope` confirms what the connection is bound to.\n2. Call `list_tasks` with `view: \"attention\"` (and the project when one is resolved) for the shared prioritized queue. Keep the returned ordering; do not invent a separate urgency score. Use `total` for counts, not the visible page length, and continue with `nextOffset` when needed.\n3. Read current work: `list_tasks` with `statusFilter: \"active\"` for a project, or `list_active_tasks_by_org` for an organization.\n4. For the few most important items, call `get_task` with `view: \"handoff\"`. Attribute comments to their author and time instead of treating them as verified facts.\n5. Use `get_organization_summary` or `get_work_unit_progress` only when a count or progress figure is needed to explain an item.\n\n## Describe what the evidence supports\n\n- For attention items, state the returned reason: blocked, in review, overdue, reported, rejected, or stale.\n- Evidence states: `reported` means a result exists without approval; `verified` means approved evidence is current; `stale` means the task or criteria changed after the result.\n- If the user asks for a historical report (for example \"what finished this week\") and dated history is not available, give a clearly labeled current snapshot and say the requested change count is unavailable. Do not invent baselines, completion counts, or delivery dates.\n\n## Present the standup\n\nKeep it short:\n\n- **Scope and time**: organization or project name, snapshot time.\n- **Needs attention**: the most important items with task identifiers, reasons, and dashboard links when returned.\n- **In progress**: current work grouped by project or work unit.\n- **Suggested next actions**: one or two, marked as recommendations.\n\nSeparate recorded facts from recommendations. A recommendation does not authorize a change; if the user wants to act on one, switch to the matching workflow (for example `triage` or `refine-task`).\n\nWhen the attention queue read succeeded and is empty, say no tasks match the attention rules in this scope. Do not equate that with all project work being complete.\n"
Full snapshot data
{
"description": "Produce a concise read-only Agiflow status summary covering completed work, work in progress, blockers, and recommended next priorities. Use for daily standups, morning checks, stakeholder updates, or a quick project pulse.",
"included_files": [],
"name": "daily-standup",
"skill_md_contents": "---\nname: daily-standup\ndescription: Produce a concise read-only Agiflow status summary covering completed work, work in progress, blockers, and recommended next priorities. Use for daily standups, morning checks, stakeholder updates, or a quick project pulse.\n---\n\n# Daily Standup\n\nGive a brief, read-only account of what needs attention, what is in progress, and the next useful action. Agiflow is the shared work record; this skill reports on it and does not change it.\n\n## Guardrails\n\n- Read only. Do not create comments, change statuses, reassign tasks, or delete anything during a standup.\n- Label the scope (organization or project) and the snapshot time. Keep the user's reporting window when one is given. Never claim \"since last check\" without a known earlier boundary.\n- A task's `updatedAt` is not its completion time or blocked-since time. Do not infer history from current status or a recent edit.\n- A review status or a checked acceptance criterion is not proof of completion. Report evidence states as returned.\n- A failed read is not an empty result. Say which reads failed or which pages were not loaded. Never say \"all clear\" when data is missing.\n\n## Gather the snapshot\n\n1. Resolve scope. If the user names a project, find it with `list_projects`. Otherwise use the current organization; `get_current_scope` confirms what the connection is bound to.\n2. Call `list_tasks` with `view: \"attention\"` (and the project when one is resolved) for the shared prioritized queue. Keep the returned ordering; do not invent a separate urgency score. Use `total` for counts, not the visible page length, and continue with `nextOffset` when needed.\n3. Read current work: `list_tasks` with `statusFilter: \"active\"` for a project, or `list_active_tasks_by_org` for an organization.\n4. For the few most important items, call `get_task` with `view: \"handoff\"`. Attribute comments to their author and time instead of treating them as verified facts.\n5. Use `get_organization_summary` or `get_work_unit_progress` only when a count or progress figure is needed to explain an item.\n\n## Describe what the evidence supports\n\n- For attention items, state the returned reason: blocked, in review, overdue, reported, rejected, or stale.\n- Evidence states: `reported` means a result exists without approval; `verified` means approved evidence is current; `stale` means the task or criteria changed after the result.\n- If the user asks for a historical report (for example \"what finished this week\") and dated history is not available, give a clearly labeled current snapshot and say the requested change count is unavailable. Do not invent baselines, completion counts, or delivery dates.\n\n## Present the standup\n\nKeep it short:\n\n- **Scope and time**: organization or project name, snapshot time.\n- **Needs attention**: the most important items with task identifiers, reasons, and dashboard links when returned.\n- **In progress**: current work grouped by project or work unit.\n- **Suggested next actions**: one or two, marked as recommendations.\n\nSeparate recorded facts from recommendations. A recommendation does not authorize a change; if the user wants to act on one, switch to the matching workflow (for example `triage` or `refine-task`).\n\nWhen the attention queue read succeeded and is empty, say no tasks match the attention rules in this scope. Do not equate that with all project work being complete.\n"
}SHA-256 of public snapshot: c92052d94febef3c659d8eff5285265187293056d7588d56938a4598e3de21f8