Update to LawDiver

{
  "description": "Verify U.S. case, statute, or specialty citations against the LawDiver corpus and report match status plus good-law / treatment signals when available. Use when the user asks if a cite is real, still good law, or overruled. Do not invent treatment signals.",
  "included_files": [
    {
      "relative_path": "agents/openai.yaml",
      "size_in_bytes": 495
    }
  ],
  "name": "check-citation-good-law",
  "skill_md_contents": "---\nname: check-citation-good-law\ndescription: Verify U.S. case, statute, or specialty citations against the LawDiver corpus and report match status plus good-law / treatment signals when available. Use when the user asks if a cite is real, still good law, or overruled. Do not invent treatment signals.\n---\n\n# Check citations and good law (LawDiver)\n\nUse LawDiver MCP tools only.\n\n## When to use\n\n- User asks whether a citation is real or in the corpus\n- User asks if a case is still good law, overruled, or negatively treated\n- User pastes cites to validate before relying on them\n\n## Steps\n\n1. Call `check_citation` with the citation string(s) the user provided.\n2. Report match vs no-match clearly. For case hits, include good-law / treatment signals from the tool result when present.\n3. If the user wants more on a matched case, call `retrieve_case` and/or `get_good_law` with the `caseId`.\n4. For statute/rule or specialty hits that include `authorityKey`, use `retrieve_statute` when the user wants the section text.\n5. If nothing matches, say so. Do not substitute a “similar” invented cite.\n\n## Do not\n\n- Invent Shepard’s-style treatment or claim a case is good law without tool support\n- Pretend a no-match cite exists in LawDiver\n- Delete, edit, or “fix” citations in any database (tools are read-only)\n"
}