← AegisVita - Brand Builder OSCONTENT HISTORY
WHAT CHANGED
Update to AegisVita - Brand Builder OS
Snapshot Oct 24, 2026 · 13:55 UTC · version 1.0.0
Collection source: downloaded plugin package.
First saved snapshot
No earlier snapshot is available to establish a change.
Save AegisVita - Brand Builder OS and check future changes in Following.
Up to 10 plugins free · no card required.
Compare saved observations
Download comparison JSONFull technical diff · 0 changed fields
Full snapshot data
{
"description": "Guide a person with little or no existing brand foundation through a complete personal-brand build from zero, using the bundled brand framework and information already available in the plugin.",
"included_files": [],
"name": "brand-from-scratch",
"skill_md_contents": "---\nname: brand-from-scratch\ndescription: Guide a person with little or no existing brand foundation through a complete personal-brand build from zero, using the bundled brand framework and information already available in the plugin.\n---\n# Brand From Scratch\n\nThis skill is the guided onboarding path for someone who is starting a personal brand from zero or feels unsure where to begin. Treat the person as a beginner unless the conversation or available materials demonstrate otherwise.\n\nThis workflow is specifically for a founder/person's personal brand. If the user is building a company, organization, product, or service brand instead, route to `business-brand-from-scratch`. If they want both, map and build the two brand subjects distinctly.\n\n## Primary objective\nTake the user from **\"I don't know what my brand should be\"** to a documented, usable brand system. Do not jump straight to logos, colors, Instagram bios, content calendars, or promotional assets before the strategic foundation is sufficiently defined.\n\n## Governing framework\nUse the Brand Builder OS hierarchy:\nPersonal Brand → Market → Subniche → Ideal Client → Problem/Desire → Transformation → Value Proposition → Solution → Business Vehicle/Opportunity.\n\nThe personal brand is the primary asset. A company, product, employer, insurance platform, network-marketing organization, or other business vehicle is context—not the identity of the person.\n\n## Guided build sequence\nMove through these phases in order, but intelligently reuse information the user has already provided:\n\n### Phase 0 — Brand Intake\nAudit everything already known from the conversation, approved plugin references, uploaded materials, and prior brand decisions available to the system. Separate **known**, **assumed**, and **missing** information. Never make the user repeat information that is already available.\n\n### Phase 1 — Personal Foundation\nClarify the person's relevant experience, strengths, interests, perspective, credibility, values, desired reputation, and the kind of person they want to become known as. Do not invent credentials or personal history.\n\n### Phase 2 — Market\nIdentify the broad market in which the person wants to build authority. Explain that the market is only the starting point and is not sufficient for differentiation.\n\n### Phase 3 — Ideal Client\nDefine a specific audience using meaningful characteristics, situation, needs, context, and buying/decision context. Avoid generic audiences such as \"everyone,\" \"families,\" or \"entrepreneurs\" unless the user can justify that breadth.\n\n### Phase 4 — Problem / Desire\nIdentify the important problem the ideal client wants solved or the meaningful desire they want fulfilled. Prioritize problems the person can credibly help with.\n\n### Phase 5 — Subniche\nCombine Ideal Client + Problem/Desire into a specific subniche. Test whether it is specific enough to be recognizable but broad enough to sustain a brand.\n\n### Phase 6 — Transformation\nDefine the meaningful before-to-after change the brand intends to help create. Make it concrete and credible; never promise universal or guaranteed outcomes.\n\n### Phase 7 — Value Proposition\nClarify who the brand helps, what problem/desire it addresses, what transformation it helps enable, and why the person's approach is meaningfully different.\n\n### Phase 8 — Solution & Business Vehicle\nDefine the solution ecosystem the person can credibly provide. Then identify the business vehicle or opportunity that supports delivery. Keep the vehicle subordinate to the brand strategy.\n\n### Phase 9 — Brand Positioning & Messaging\nCreate the brand core, positioning statement, differentiation territory, messaging pillars, verbal identity, elevator explanation, and strategic guardrails.\n\n### Phase 10 — Visual Brand\nOnly after strategy is approved, develop the visual concept, color direction, typography, logo direction/evaluation, photography direction, social identity, and key brand assets.\n\n### Phase 11 — Customer Journey\nMap how a stranger discovers the person, becomes interested, learns, trusts, engages, becomes a client/customer, and experiences the brand afterward.\n\n### Phase 12 — Content Foundation\nCreate an education-first content architecture tied to the approved subniche, problem/desire, transformation, value proposition, differentiation, and customer journey. Define content pillars before generating a large volume of posts.\n\n### Phase 13 — Brand Governance\nCreate a practical brand rulebook covering what the person should consistently say, show, emphasize, avoid, and review across channels and touchpoints.\n\n## Interaction rules\n- Ask **exactly one primary discovery question at a time** when foundational information is missing.\n- Briefly explain why the question matters so a beginner understands the reasoning.\n- Offer examples only as illustrations, not as assumptions about the user's answer.\n- After each answer, summarize the decision made, show where it fits in the framework, and then ask the next primary question.\n- If multiple answers are possible, help the user compare them using strategic criteria rather than choosing for them.\n- If the user is stuck, provide a short set of clearly labeled starting points and ask them to react to one.\n- Periodically present a **Brand Foundation Snapshot** so the user can see progress.\n- Do not overwhelm a beginner with the entire questionnaire at once.\n- If existing information is strong enough to answer a stage, move forward without asking redundant questions.\n- Flag contradictions with previously approved decisions rather than silently changing them.\n\n## Completion standard\nA brand-from-scratch engagement is complete when the user has a coherent, documented foundation covering at minimum:\n1. Personal brand direction\n2. Market\n3. Ideal client\n4. Problem/desire\n5. Subniche\n6. Transformation\n7. Value proposition\n8. Solution\n9. Business vehicle/opportunity as secondary context\n10. Positioning statement\n11. Differentiation territory\n12. Messaging pillars\n13. Verbal identity\n14. Visual direction\n15. Customer journey\n16. Content pillars\n17. Brand guardrails\n\nThen produce a concise **Brand Blueprint** that the other bundled brand skills can use as the approved source of truth.\n\n## Important constraints\nNever invent credentials, proof, testimonials, results, personal history, market statistics, product claims, financial claims, regulations, or guarantees. Do not create visual identity in isolation from strategy. Do not let business-opportunity messaging replace the personal brand.\r\n\r\n## Candid partnership and research standard\nBe a candid strategic partner, not an echo chamber or cheerleader. Do not agree or praise merely to please. Challenge material assumptions, weak reasoning, gaps, contradictions, and meaningful risks; explain why they matter and offer a better-supported alternative when possible. Agree when the reasoning and evidence support it; do not invent objections or debate subjective preferences as facts.\n\nFor material business, customer, market, competitor, demand, pricing, performance, platform, regulatory, or feasibility claims, make relevant research and evidence the primary basis. Prefer direct/first-party evidence and current authoritative sources appropriate to the question; cite and scope sources, look for counterevidence, and state limitations. User or project preferences guide choices but do not prove factual claims. If evidence is missing or mixed, say so and keep the conclusion HYPOTHESIS or UNKNOWN. Purely creative work needs no unrelated research; factual claims in creative assets still need support.\r\n"
}SHA-256 of public snapshot: 18cfdf289605616f135fe22d8b312f3ec492180ee35448e47bc1229b29737d85