← Headcount: ExecutiveCONTENT HISTORY
WHAT CHANGED
Update to Headcount: Executive
Snapshot Oct 24, 2026 · 13:55 UTC · version 1.0.1
Collection source: downloaded plugin package.
First saved snapshot
No earlier snapshot is available to establish a change.
Save Headcount: Executive and check future changes in Following.
Up to 10 plugins free · no card required.
Compare saved observations
Download comparison JSONFull technical diff · 0 changed fields
Full snapshot data
{
"description": "Raises capital and manages the relationship afterward — deciding how much and why, understanding what dilution and preferences actually cost, running a process with real competitive tension, preparing for diligence before it starts, and reporting to investors and a board in a way that keeps support when results are bad. Use this to plan a raise, evaluate a term sheet beyond the valuation, prepare a data room, or fix reporting that is producing surprises.",
"included_files": [
{
"relative_path": "references/sources.md",
"size_in_bytes": 2198
}
],
"name": "fundraising-and-investor-relations",
"skill_md_contents": "---\nname: fundraising-and-investor-relations\ndescription: Raises capital and manages the relationship afterward — deciding how much and why, understanding what dilution and preferences actually cost, running a process with real competitive tension, preparing for diligence before it starts, and reporting to investors and a board in a way that keeps support when results are bad. Use this to plan a raise, evaluate a term sheet beyond the valuation, prepare a data room, or fix reporting that is producing surprises.\n---\n\n# Fundraising and investor relations\n\nCapital is bought, not received, and the terms matter more than the headline number. So does what\nhappens for the years afterward, which is where most of the relationship actually lives.\n\n**Financing terms have legal and tax consequences that vary by structure and jurisdiction. Get\nqualified counsel and your accountant on any instrument before signing.**\n\n## Decide the amount from the plan, not from the market\n\nRaise against what the money buys: the milestones that will make the next raise possible, plus\nenough runway to reach them and to be wrong once. Working back from milestones gives a number you\ncan defend and a story that connects the raise to the outcome.\n\nRaising more than the plan needs is not free — it costs dilution now and sets a valuation you have\nto grow into. Raising too little is worse, because running out mid-plan is the weakest possible\nnegotiating position and everyone on the other side of the table knows it.\n\n## Understand what the terms cost, because valuation is the least of them\n\nA high valuation with punishing terms is worse than a lower one with clean terms, and founders\nroutinely trade the second for the first because only the first is quotable.\n\n- **Liquidation preference** determines who gets paid first and how much before common shares see\n anything. A participating preference or a multiple can mean an apparently good exit returns\n little to founders and staff.\n- **Anti-dilution** decides what happens if the next round is lower. The broader forms can shift\n ownership substantially in exactly the circumstances where you can least afford it.\n- **Board composition and protective provisions** determine what you can do without asking. This\n is control, and it is permanent in a way valuation is not.\n- **Option pool sizing** placed before the investment dilutes existing holders only. Where the pool\n sits in the calculation is a real price negotiation dressed as an administrative detail.\n\nModel the outcome at several exit values, not just the good one. The terms that matter most only\nexpress themselves in the mediocre cases, which are the most likely ones.\n\n## Run a process, because tension is what produces terms\n\nA raise conducted sequentially with one interested party is a negotiation with one side. Run\nconversations in parallel on a compressed timeline so that decisions land close together.\n\nPrepare before starting. A process that stalls while you assemble materials loses its momentum, and\nmomentum is most of what you are manufacturing.\n\n## Assemble diligence before you need it\n\nCap table and every instrument that affects it, signed contracts, employment and contractor\nagreements with their IP assignments, financial statements and the model behind them, key metrics\nwith their definitions, and the corporate record.\n\n**Diligence surfaces the things nobody dealt with earlier** — a missing assignment from a\ncontractor, an unsigned amendment, a metric defined differently in two places. Each is small alone\nand each costs time at the worst moment. Fix them before the process, not during it.\n\nNever present a metric to investors that is defined differently from how you report it internally.\nThat inconsistency is found, and it costs credibility disproportionately.\n\n## Report on a rhythm, and report the bad news first\n\nInvestor relationships are managed between raises. A regular update — monthly or quarterly, short,\nconsistent in format — costs an hour and buys enormous latitude when something goes wrong.\n\n**Surprise is the thing that damages the relationship, not bad results.** An investor told early\nabout a problem is a resource; the same investor told late is a governance issue. Lead with what is\nnot working, what you are doing, and what you need.\n\nAsk for specific help. \"Let us know if you can help\" produces nothing; a named introduction or a\nspecific question produces something.\n\n## The board is a different audience from investors\n\nBoard material goes out days ahead and is read before the meeting, so the meeting is for decisions\nrather than presentation. Bring the real questions, including the ones you do not have answers to —\na board only shown finished thinking cannot help with anything and eventually stops trying.\n\n## Sources\n\n`references/sources.md` in this skill lists the outside authorities that settle the questions\nhere — what each one is authoritative for, and what you may do with it. Check them before\nanswering on anything they cover, and cite what you used. Most are free to read and not free\nto reproduce; the use note on each is binding.\n\n## Never\n\n- Optimize a term sheet on valuation without modeling the preference stack at mediocre exits.\n- Start a process before the data room would survive being opened.\n- Present a metric to investors under a definition you do not use internally.\n- Let an investor learn about a material problem after it is already resolved or already worse.\n"
}SHA-256 of public snapshot: f217af1a1eec49397cf3cd21d12e1ae69ff74c6ed0f43fc6ab8b6bc874f65782