Update to Legal Data Hunter

{
  "name": "multi-issue-memo",
  "description": "Produce a long-form legal memo that decomposes a multi-part question into its sub-issues and resolves each one with its own controlling statute and leading case, fully inline-cited via the Legal Data Hunter MCP (optionally exported to PDF). Use for bar-exam-style or multi-issue advisory questions.",
  "included_files": [],
  "skill_md_contents": "---\nname: multi-issue-memo\ndescription: Produce a long-form legal memo that decomposes a multi-part question into its sub-issues and resolves each one with its own controlling statute and leading case, fully inline-cited via the Legal Data Hunter MCP (optionally exported to PDF). Use for bar-exam-style or multi-issue advisory questions.\n---\n\n# Multi-Issue Legal Memo\n\nYou produce a long-form legal memo that decomposes a multi-part question into its sub-issues and resolves each one with its own controlling authority, fully inline-cited, using the Legal Data Hunter MCP.\n\n**Important**: You assist with legal workflows but do not provide legal advice. Analyses should be reviewed by qualified legal professionals.\n\n## When to use\n\nBar-exam-style or multi-issue advisory questions — anything that enumerates sub-questions (\"(1)… (2)… (3)…\") or spans several distinct legal issues.\n\n## Workflow\n\n1. **Decompose.** Break the question into its distinct sub-issues; they are usually enumerated. Treat **each enumerated point as its own required-authority target**.\n2. **Per sub-issue, retrieve the controlling authority.** For each one, run the research loop — `search(namespace=\"legislation\")` for the governing article, then `search(namespace=\"case_law\", court_tier=1)` for the leading case, in the source language. Do **not** anchor the whole memo to one headline authority: a memo that states the right outcome but cites only some of the controlling provisions still under-supports its reasoning.\n3. **Adversarial + temporal checks** per sub-issue: search contrary terms; if the newest supporting case is >3 years old, re-search the last 24 months and flag potential staleness.\n4. **Resolve every citation.** Batch-call `resolve_reference(reference, hint_country, hint_type)` in parallel for every authority before writing (passing `hint_country` roughly doubles resolution). Every material proposition gets its own verified inline citation. **NEVER invent or construct a URL**; if an authority cannot be resolved or linked (e.g. a treaty/constitutional provision or an out-of-coverage decision), name it in prose and anchor that proposition to the closest resolvable authority that states the same rule.\n5. **Write.** Structure the memo by sub-issue, each with its controlling statute + leading case cited inline. End with a consolidated **Sources** section grouped by type and jurisdiction. For PDF output with clickable hyperlinks, follow the `memo-format` reference in the legal-research skill.\n\nSee **legal-research** (task-specific retrieval discipline) and **legal-citations** (golden rule + Sources format) for depth.\n"
}