← KeenableCONTENT HISTORYWHAT CHANGED · RULE-BASED ANALYSIS
Update to Keenable
Snapshot Sep 30, 2026 · 22:48 UTC · version 2.0.1
Collection source: not recorded for this historical snapshot.
First saved snapshot
No earlier snapshot is available to establish a change.
Compare saved observations
Download comparison JSONFull technical diff · 0 changed fields
Full snapshot data
{
"name": "keenable-deep-research",
"description": "Run comprehensive multi-source web research with Keenable and synthesize a cited answer. Use for literature reviews, market and competitor analyses, and detailed comparisons.",
"included_files": [],
"skill_md_contents": "---\nname: keenable-deep-research\ndescription: \"Run comprehensive multi-source web research with Keenable and synthesize a cited answer. Use for literature reviews, market and competitor analyses, and detailed comparisons.\"\n---\n\n# Keenable Deep Research\n\nProduce a thorough, well-cited answer to a broad question by iterating over the\nKeenable search and extract tools. Use this for tasks that a single search can't\ncover: literature reviews, market and competitor analyses, and detailed\ncomparisons.\n\n## Workflow\n\n1. **Decompose.** Break the question into 3-6 concrete sub-questions. State them\n before searching so the plan is auditable.\n2. **Search per sub-question.** Run a focused `search_web_pages` query for each.\n Keep queries specific; split further when coverage is thin.\n3. **Read the strongest sources.** Use `fetch_page_content` on the most relevant\n results to read them in full rather than trusting snippets for anything\n consequential.\n4. **Cross-check.** For any claim that affects the conclusion, confirm it against\n at least one independent source. Note disagreements explicitly.\n5. **Synthesize.** Write the answer in your own words, grouped by sub-question or\n theme. Cite every factual claim with its source URL. Separate sourced facts\n from your own analysis, and call out gaps or low-confidence areas.\n\n## Guidance\n\n- Track which sub-questions are answered and which still need work; keep going\n until the question is covered, not just until the first search returns.\n- Prefer primary and authoritative sources; treat aggregators and undated pages\n with caution.\n- For relative dates, compute exact dates from today before searching.\n- The tools are rate-limited. If a long research run hits the limit, report what\n was covered so far and stop instead of retrying in a loop; never ask the user\n to paste an API key or any other credential into the conversation.\n"
}SHA-256: 93bcc0936dc9126df6431222498bdb8f5ab1a7b7b3cc8767c3acab70303fccde