← Research & Writing CopilotCONTENT HISTORY
WHAT CHANGED
Update to Research & Writing Copilot
Snapshot Nov 3, 2026 · 18:48 UTC · version 0.2.0
Collection source: downloaded plugin package.
First saved snapshot
No earlier snapshot is available to establish a change.
Save Research & Writing Copilot and check future changes in Following.
Up to 10 plugins free · no card required.
Compare saved observations
Download comparison JSONFull technical diff · 0 changed fields
Full snapshot data
{
"description": "Fact-check an existing draft for unsupported, stale, conflicting or overstated factual and technical claims while preserving the author voice.",
"included_files": [],
"name": "fact-check-draft",
"skill_md_contents": "---\nname: fact-check-draft\ndescription: Fact-check an existing draft for unsupported, stale, conflicting or overstated factual and technical claims while preserving the author voice.\n---\n\n# Fact Check Draft\n\n**Shared standards.** Preserve the user's purpose and existing material; never fabricate evidence, URLs, quotations, citations, first-person experiences, interviews, tool runs or publication. Distinguish sourced observations from independent reproduction and analysis. Use actual host research/files/code tools when available; disclose unavailable verification. For current facts, verify fresh authoritative sources. Ask only when an essential constraint prevents useful work.\n\n## Procedure\n1. Read the complete draft or meaningful section. Preserve thesis, structure and verified claims unless the user explicitly requests full restructuring.\n2. Separate stable explanations from time-sensitive statements (versions, dates, pricing, statistics, API behavior, releases, named roles).\n3. Research material claims using authoritative recent sources. Record original wording, status, replacement and supporting evidence.\n4. Patch the smallest necessary spans. For unresolved claims, qualify, remove or flag clearly; do not disguise a gap with vague confident wording.\n5. Check that fixes do not introduce new contradictions elsewhere in the piece.\n## Deliver\nComplete revised copy if rewriting was requested, plus a short factual-change ledger showing material changes and remaining verification gaps. Avoid unnecessary polishing of the author's voice.\n\n## Related references\n- Read `../../references/fact-check-and-edit.md` when it materially informs this task.\n- Read `../../references/evidence-policy.md` when it materially informs this task.\n- Read `../../references/citation-workflows.md` when it materially informs this task.\n"
}SHA-256 of public snapshot: f9ce2a9e25aec0c315c8aff4ead8beee4f2916e7a5f471e541d5147dfe1402ea