← Research & Writing CopilotCONTENT HISTORY

Update to Research & Writing Copilot

Snapshot Nov 3, 2026 · 18:48 UTC · version 0.2.0

Collection source: downloaded plugin package.

WHAT CHANGED

First saved snapshot

No earlier snapshot is available to establish a change.

Save Research & Writing Copilot and check future changes in Following.

Up to 10 plugins free · no card required.

Compare saved observations

Download comparison JSON
Full technical diff · 0 changed fields
Full snapshot data
{
  "description": "Discover, triage and critically synthesize academic or technical papers with study design, limitations and citation integrity.",
  "included_files": [],
  "name": "literature-review",
  "skill_md_contents": "---\nname: literature-review\ndescription: Discover, triage and critically synthesize academic or technical papers with study design, limitations and citation integrity.\n---\n\n# Literature Review\n\n**Shared standards.** Preserve the user's purpose and existing material; never fabricate evidence, URLs, quotations, citations, first-person experiences, interviews, tool runs or publication. Distinguish sourced observations from independent reproduction and analysis. Use actual host research/files/code tools when available; disclose unavailable verification. For current facts, verify fresh authoritative sources. Ask only when an essential constraint prevents useful work.\n\n## Procedure\n1. Define a narrow research question, inclusion/exclusion boundaries, publication window and evidence types. Do not imply a systematic review unless methods justify it.\n2. Locate original studies, standards and credible reviews. Verify titles, authors, year, DOI and publication status. Check retractions/corrections when possible.\n3. Extract population/data, setting, design, intervention/method, comparator, metrics, main findings, uncertainty and limitations.\n4. Distinguish peer review, preprints, technical reports and vendor publications. Do not treat citation counts as a proxy for validity.\n5. Synthesize agreement, disagreement, methodological weaknesses, and practical implications; report search coverage and missing full-text access.\n## Deliver\nAn evidence matrix and narrative synthesis with accurate citations and limitations. Never invent experimental results, statistical significance, or page numbers.\n\n## Related references\n- Read `../../references/literature-synthesis.md` when it materially informs this task.\n- Read `../../references/citation-workflows.md` when it materially informs this task.\n- Read `../../references/evidence-policy.md` when it materially informs this task.\n"
}

SHA-256 of public snapshot: 57666f40db259486449aebdb5e1414492095656f1cfe1014d9e103f9de2a8be6